Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
The problem is in the way you write the English language. Your post intimated a parity between both candidates with does not exist. Catholics who know the moral law can understand the difference between the two candidates between one candidate who for example constantly supports partial birth abortion and the other who tried to stop it. They are not both more or less pro-Choice. That is a deliberate obfuscation of the facts. Kerry is clearly the one who will open the doors to horrors with regard to the Life issues. Bush is the one who has tried to contain and stop the forward movement of this terror against the unborn and against life.

It is fun to see you still up to your old tricks, sinkspur.

39 posted on 10/29/2004 8:05:32 AM PDT by Siobhan (Pray without ceasing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Siobhan
They are not both more or less pro-Choice

The Church says that direct abortion is not permitted, under any circumstances.

Does George W. Bush allow for exceptions to the Church's position on abortion? Yes, or no?

Is the child aborted after an incestuous act any less dead than the child aborted through convenience?

My point, Siobhan, is that it is too facile to simply declare that anyone who votes for John Kerry is in mortal sin and one who votes for George W. Bush is not.

I support George W. Bush and have already voted for him, and believe he is pro-life compared to Kerry. But he is not 100% pro-life, according to the Church. You can call this "word games" if you wish, but the teaching of the Church is clear.

47 posted on 10/29/2004 8:19:57 AM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Siobhan
It is fun to see you still up to your old tricks, sinkspur.

We have an auxilliary bishop here in Michigan who does the same sort of thing. He is giving his congregation and many Catholics in this state the excuse to vote for Kerry, basically saying that because Kerry supports the social agenda of the left and Bush does not it is better to vote for Kerry. It is leading people astray. I pray the good deacon does not go this far when he speaks to other Catholics in person.

171 posted on 10/30/2004 5:50:55 AM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Siobhan
It is fun to see you still up to your old tricks, sinkspur.

We have an auxilliary bishop here in Michigan who does the same sort of thing. He is giving his congregation and many Catholics in this state the excuse to vote for Kerry, basically saying that because Kerry supports the social agenda of the left and Bush does not it is better to vote for Kerry. It is leading people astray. I pray the good deacon does not go this far when he speaks to other Catholics in person.

172 posted on 10/30/2004 5:52:32 AM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson