Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Siobhan
That is a tremendous misrepresentation, mister.

Is it? Bush admits exceptions. The Church does not. How is it a "misrepresentation" to say that Bush is not fully pro-life?

37 posted on 10/29/2004 7:53:06 AM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
The problem is in the way you write the English language. Your post intimated a parity between both candidates with does not exist. Catholics who know the moral law can understand the difference between the two candidates between one candidate who for example constantly supports partial birth abortion and the other who tried to stop it. They are not both more or less pro-Choice. That is a deliberate obfuscation of the facts. Kerry is clearly the one who will open the doors to horrors with regard to the Life issues. Bush is the one who has tried to contain and stop the forward movement of this terror against the unborn and against life.

It is fun to see you still up to your old tricks, sinkspur.

39 posted on 10/29/2004 8:05:32 AM PDT by Siobhan (Pray without ceasing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson