Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris

"This is entirely unconstitutional! Remember that the separation of church and state goes both ways!"

Actually, it doesn't. It was intended to protect church against state only; never the other way round.

To say that the Constitution prevents churches from interfering in government is just dead wrong.


164 posted on 10/30/2004 3:04:01 AM PDT by dsc (LIBERALS: If we weren't so darned civilized, there'd be a bounty on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

Of course it was meant to protect the government too! For the most powerful church to control the government means a very short step from that church becoming the ONLY church. History is chock full of good examples of why it's a bad idea. The leadership of the Church of England being in such control of things pre-U.S. independence probably had something to do with that particular part of the Constitution. It has to be a two-way protection, or it is no protection at all.


176 posted on 10/30/2004 10:09:37 PM PDT by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson