That 'hole' is only in your head.
After all, in overall context, you're trying to prove the point that States have the 'right' to infringe upon our individual freedoms.
You're dreaming, not me.
#230 sums up your contradictions quite clearly, and I invite any reader to look it over. As for you, I'll let you have the last word, unless you shock me by making an actual point.
I'm afraid you're actually going to have to address his point head on (without trying to change the subject to state "infringement") in order to have any kind of credibility with me.
But, I think we both know you can't. Give it up. Without anything to support your contention you're acting like a troll, and we can't have that on this board.
At least, I won't put up with it. Name calling is no substitute for honest debate.