Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
"Any more than anti-polygamy laws violate due process?"

Correct. If ten people (regardless of gender) want to get 'unioned,' let them create a word to describe their relationship and try to get an amendment passed that would recognized their class and afford them protection under the Civil Rights Act.

(Jeez, I was hoping everyone would understand what I was implying -- that such an amendment would not pass, but the process would be there for those who chose to pursue their folly and would thereby be unable to claim deprivation of rights.)

116 posted on 10/29/2004 1:44:28 PM PDT by Eastbound ("Neither a Scrooge nor a Patsy Be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound
Correct. If ten people (regardless of gender) want to get 'unioned,' let them create a word to describe their relationship and try to get an amendment passed that would recognized their class and afford them protection under the Civil Rights Act.

I believe this is what Heinlien described as a "Line Marriage" (from The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, IIRC).

120 posted on 10/29/2004 2:17:47 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson