Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W's women
TownHall ^ | October 28, 2004 | Novak

Posted on 10/28/2004 4:41:20 AM PDT by Perdogg

WASHINGTON -- Pollster John Zogby surprised the political world back in April with a long-range prediction that John Kerry would defeat George W. Bush for president. On Monday this week, Zogby told me, he changed his mind. He now thinks the president is more likely to be re-elected because he has reinforced support from his base, including married white women.

That conclusion would be a surprise for frantically nervous Republicans and cautiously upbeat Democrats entering the campaign's final days. In fact, nobody, including Zogby and all the other polltakers, can be sure who will win this election. Yet, it is clear that President Bush's strategists have succeeded in solidifying his base to a degree that makes it much harder to defeat him next Tuesday.

The long, tortuous presidential contest has come down to who the "security mom" thinks can best protect her family against terrorism. Based on current polling data, Bush has won that argument in the face of Sen. Kerry's relentless attacks. That explains why the Democratic nominee this week was not talking about health care or other standby issues of his party, but was trying to pierce Bush's security shield by harping on the disappearance of munitions in Iraq.

The difficulty that Kerry now encounters has been shrouded by misleading overnight tracking from last weekend, showing a Democratic surge that is common in Friday-through-Sunday polling. Otherwise, Kerry is in trouble. When Zogby had second thoughts Monday, he found Bush with a national lead of three percentage points and an undecided vote of only 2.7 percent.

The data shows the undecided voters in Bush's base are resolving their misgivings about the president. Zogby's subgroups in the Republican base -- such as investors, military and married couples -- are returning to Bush.

Zogby shows Kerry's advantage among women is only three percentage points, exactly the same margin reflected in the nightly tracking by Republican pollster Ed Goeas. The Goeas poll shows a 13-percentage point Bush advantage among men. Goeas's poll has white men favoring Bush over Kerry, 58 percent to 35 percent. Remarkably, the count among white married women is not far behind: 53 percent for Bush, 42 percent for Kerry. The problem for the Democrats is Bush's continued large lead over Kerry concerning which candidate voters prefer to fight terrorism.

If these numbers hold up, the campaign strategy of Bush political adviser Karl Rove will be vindicated. While Kerry's strategy seems to have a thousand fathers, no presidential campaign in my experience has been so completely in the hands of one man as Bush's. Amid much private criticism in GOP ranks, Rove has concentrated on mobilizing the base behind Bush as the anti-terror candidate rather than making conventional overtures to undecided centrists.

With his base secure this week, the Bush strategy did turn to Democratic voters -- not with the usual leftward turn but appealing to hard-liners who have trouble accepting Kerry leading the war against terror. Campaigning in Wisconsin Tuesday, Bush invoked the memory of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy for their "resolve in times of war and in hours of crisis" -- drawing an unfavorable comparison with Kerry. Bush is after the security moms, Republican or Democrat.

On the same day, the Kerry campaign threw out previous plans and made the candidate's centerpiece a New York Times report of 380 tons of explosives found missing from Iraq. Although NBC embedded reporters said the explosives were gone when U.S. troops arrived in March 2003, Kerry insisted for two days that this was another example of Bush's inadequacy in waging the war on terror. Whether such a complex issue appeals to security moms is another matter.

A lot can happen in the next few days. In 2000, Zogby had Bush three percentage points ahead at this stage, but Al Gore seized the lead because of the attack on Social Security privatization and the revelation of Bush's drunk driving case.

Kerry needs what he has been unable to accomplish so far: a direct hit on Bush's anti-terrorism credentials. It is hard to imagine a Democratic victory without removing those security moms from under Bush's anti-terrorism banner.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2004 4:41:20 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Married white women - that would be me - You're Welcome.


2 posted on 10/28/2004 4:43:34 AM PDT by Republican Red (A Global Freak'n Test ???????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

As a security mom, I can categorically state that there is NOTHING the Kerry campaign can say or do that will convince me they would do a better job in this arena. After all, why should I believe their words over these past years of direct evidence?


3 posted on 10/28/2004 4:43:47 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

God Bless the Moms!


4 posted on 10/28/2004 4:44:53 AM PDT by bust (A biased media is the biggest threat to our democracy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bust

Mommy bump.


5 posted on 10/28/2004 4:46:01 AM PDT by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Mommys rule the world!!!


6 posted on 10/28/2004 4:51:49 AM PDT by SaintDismas (Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

My solidly democratic sister is starting to waver on the security issue. She's starting to realize that she may not be getting the whole story from the media. And that concerns her a lot.


7 posted on 10/28/2004 4:52:58 AM PDT by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

bump


8 posted on 10/28/2004 4:53:08 AM PDT by prophetic (What do u call someone who flip-flops so much? A Politician? No, a HYPOCRITE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Thanks! ;)


9 posted on 10/28/2004 4:53:38 AM PDT by Perdogg (Dubya - Right Man, Right Job, at the Right Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Give your democrat friend one of these for there car it's big but worth trying to get it printed on large paper.


10 posted on 10/28/2004 4:54:15 AM PDT by antisocialista (Illegitimus Non Carborundum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I am a single little old lady and did not need Zogby to tell me how I was voting. I did not need 911 to liberate myself from the indentured servitude of the liberal femocrats.

The factor that is not being taken into account by Zogby is that the coalition built by FDR has been eroding for decades and the situation has been made worse by not permitting dissent among women and minorities.

I did not climb up the food chain to be pushed back by an angry overprivileged white woman who can't get ahead because she can't negotiate well and who is not mentally competent to appreciate the stay at home moms.


11 posted on 10/28/2004 4:55:18 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

"Goeas's poll has white men favoring Bush over Kerry, 58 percent to 35 percent. Remarkably, the count among white married women is not far behind: 53 percent for Bush, 42 percent for Kerry."


If among whites Bush leads that much, and they said he also up among Blacks, Jews, and Catholics, how come he's up only about 3-5% ?


12 posted on 10/28/2004 4:57:55 AM PDT by paudio (???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

This man at work is voting for Kerry and his wife is voting for Bush. I asked him why he wants to vote for a man who wants to increase taxes.....he said "I don't make over $200,000 a year."


13 posted on 10/28/2004 5:02:48 AM PDT by benice (Dan Rather is evil,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
how come he's up only about 3-5%?

A close race sells newspapers, ait time, and keeps the candidates in the public eye, IMHO.

14 posted on 10/28/2004 5:03:11 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

And if Momma ain't happy, ain't nobody happy. So that means W gets the husband of security mom vote.


15 posted on 10/28/2004 5:04:28 AM PDT by armymarinedad (Proud father of death from above)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

wow- an almost positive message by McCain lover in Chief - Novak. someone is throwing snowballs at Lucifer.


16 posted on 10/28/2004 5:05:48 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
He now thinks the president is more likely to be re-elected because he has reinforced support from his base, including married white women.

This is very true. Even my normally non politically minded wife is trying to convince everyone who will listen to vote for W.

17 posted on 10/28/2004 5:06:35 AM PDT by UsnDadof8 (Get out there and vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I smell a landslide


18 posted on 10/28/2004 5:07:27 AM PDT by UsnDadof8 (Get out there and vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Very interesting! Many other polls inexplicably show Kerry leading among men. Many people (esp. men!) have disputed this. But if Ed Goeas's poll shows a big lead for GWB with men then it is good news. If Bush-Cheney have a lead with men, and women, then I think we win. ;-)


19 posted on 10/28/2004 5:19:50 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

George Bush's Women


20 posted on 10/28/2004 5:20:28 AM PDT by Hawkeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson