A couple of callers tried to bring up these points on the Art Bell Show (he's anti-Iraq war). He said nonsense, if Saddam had weapons he would have used them, not sent them to Syria.
Another caller tried to tell him about the UN Oil for Food Scandal. Unfortunately, the caller was inarticulate. Bell said he never heard anything about it. Besides, so what? Everybody is always trying to work a deal.
Same as he would have used those Mig-25s against US aircraft instead of burying them in the desert? But in the desert they were found.
Clearly Saddam thought he and his regime would survive any US action and he could then retrieve the weapons for use against the more unruly parts of his country, against his neighbors, or give them to the likes of the Palestinian and Al Qaeda terrorists.
Sent Art a FastBlast on Oil for Food right after that call.
No reply.
Being thorough and honest about Hussein's wmds is one thing and open to legitimate criticism. But the anti-Iraq group would have us believe that Hussein was totally incapable of having or using them which is nothing short of incredible. The man's history points to his either giving them to terrorists or using them on his own people. Why the anti-war clique thinks that transporting his wmds across the border to Syria is not credible is astonishing in it's naivete.