Posted on 10/17/2004 1:29:55 AM PDT by Jimbaugh
Boxer's opponent still unable to run campaign ads on TV
By Erica Werner ASSOCIATED PRESS
October 16, 2004
WASHINGTON Sen. Barbara Boxer has raised $16 million for her campaign for a third Senate term, compared with $6.2 million for Republican opponent Bill Jones, according to campaign finance reports filed yesterday.
AdvertisementThe Federal Election Commission reports show Boxer, D-Calif., who has begun to spend heavily on television ads, with $1.4 million cash on hand as of Sept. 30. Jones had $838,000.
Though he has been trailing in polls, Jones managed to raise more money than Boxer during the most recent fund-raising quarter. He pulled in $2.4 million from July 1 to Sept. 30, versus $1.8 million for Boxer.
But the money was not enough to erase Jones' financial disadvantage or allow him to begin airing TV ads. Jones pledged in July to spend $2 million of his own money on the campaign, but he hasn't done so yet, and yesterday he refused to say when he would.
Boxer, meanwhile, has reserved TV ad time through Nov. 2.
In an interview yesterday, Jones' senior strategist, Ed Rollins, didn't bother trying to sound optimistic. He said Jones would need to spend not just $2 million but $5 million to open a path to victory a sum that he said the candidate had promised, though Jones only ever said $2 million publicly.
"I don't know of any campaign in California that's ever been won statewide when you haven't been on television, and we are not on television," Rollins said. "And if we're going to go on television you saw our report obviously the only money to go on television is Bill's money, and he's got to make that decision."
A week of TV ads in California costs as much as $2 million.
"I've asked him and asked him, and he knows where we are," Rollins said. "The decision is now his."
The Boxer campaign also was waiting to see what Jones would do.
"The big remaining question in the race is: Will Bill Jones use his personal fortune to put TV ads on the air, or will he change his mind?" said Boxer campaign manager Rose Kapolczynski, adding that Boxer wasn't taking victory for granted.
"She's fighting for every vote," Kapolczynski said.
Jones, California's former secretary of state, said in an interview that it was still his intention to spend $2 million, but he didn't answer directly when asked whether he might spend $5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Rollins is the same guy who put the screws to Bill Simon Campaign. He was the guy who gave Simon the OK to use the photo of Gray Davis taking the check at a government office., (It turned out to be a fake)
Ed Rollins should never get another job in any Republican campaign.
The enemy is within the gates.
First of all, I'm not sure what the qualifications for a "purist" Republican are. It's pretty subjective word.
Secondly, the moderate and conservative Republicans are not the ones who fail to be team player. Give me an example. I can give you many where the left-leaning Republicans are not the team player. Tom Campbell ran against Konnyu in the 80s, then he got full support in the general. But no one was allowed to run against him.
In 2002, I called my county central committee to volunteer. I was told not to bother promoting Bill Simon, to concentrate on Bruce McPherson.
In 2002, Simon beat Riordan in the primary. He lost by less than 5%, which could have been closer if Riordan backed Simon and campaigned for him. Of course, Simon campaigned for and supported Schwarzenegger in 2003. Simon would also have gotten a lot closer if the CRP had actually supported him in 2002. Instead, they took their ball and went home. Instead, the White House found out that top CRP officials started a group called "Republicans for Davis."
In 2002, McClintock lost the closest race in CA history, trying for controller. Did the party give 1 cent to their best chance for getting a statewide Republican in 2002. No, they'd rather have NO statewide Republicans than give him even a small contribution. That is really the best example. Think about it: if the CRP put just a bit of money in that race it wouldn't have been shut out in 2002. But no.
Riordan, the Godfather of left-leaning Republicans donated exclusively to Democrats. I can't find one Republican he donated to before 2003, but he was one of the top donors to Gray Davis, and also gave money to Feinstein, Boxer, John Burton, Maxine Waters, etc. He's the kind of team player we need more of, right?
Steve Poisner is now running for AD21 campaigning against President Bush.
Toney Casey is a RINO (Moderate) that would sell out her own mother.
Bill Jones has run an anemic campaign, as if he doesn't really want the job. Sometimes, people become candidates to establish new business connections with party contributors. Jones strikes me as such a candidate. The only reason he has even a small chance is that Barbara Boxer has such low approval ratings.
Ping-ping-ping!!!
Probably Parsky's pick, seeing as he did it to Bill Simon, making him dump Sal Russo and take Rollins or go without any CAGOP money.
Edward J. Rollins is a political commentator for CBS News and a strategic consultant. He was most recently the Co-Chairman and Campaign Manager of the Ross Perot Presidential Campaign.
WOW this is a great surprise!!!
With her long campaign over, Whitman should have been able to breathe a sigh of relief. But, just a short time after the votes were in, Rollins told the press that the reason they had won was because they had paid African-American ministers to suppress the vote among their parishioners. "We went into black churches and we basically said to ministers who had endorsed Florio, 'Do you have a special project?' And they said, 'We've already endorsed Florio.' We said, 'That's fine ó don't get up on the Sunday pulpit and preach. We know you've endorsed him, but don't get up there and say it's your moral obligation that you go on Tuesday to vote for Jim Florio,'" Rollins was reported as saying in Time. Money was also supposedly paid to election workers in Democratic neighborhoods (who were supposed to be getting people to the polls) to stay home. Rollins bragged that these measures were key in Whitman's election to governor.
His comments unleashed a furor of responses from many people, most notably black ministers. Edward Verner, head of a Newark black minister's organization, commented in Time: "To suggest that the black vote or the black church is up for sale is a racist lie." Whitman herself was appalled, and claimed that her manager's statement was an unequivocated lie. Rollins soon retracted his statements, telling People that his remarks were "an exaggeration that turned out to be inaccurate." However, a federal judge ruled that an investigation would be necessary. Whitman assured the voters that she would agree to a new vote if any illegalities were uncovered.
Rollins's wife, Sherrie, claimed in People that her husband "feels awful about this furor he has created. He did not intend to hurt anyone. He feels so badly for Christie. He did not want to taint her victory." It turned out that no proof could be found to substantiate Rollins's initial claims, and by November 29, 1993, the Democrats abandoned their campaign to have the election results decertified. On January 12, 1994, state and federal investigators ended their investigation into the campaign and deemed Whitman innocent of the charges.
"Don't let the hullabaloo over the alleged antivoting activities of campaign manager Ed Rollins blind the nation to the significance of Christie Whitman's victory last month in the New Jersey gubernatorial election. She won on character and substance," Malcolm Forbes asserted in one of his magazine's editorials. After the election, Whitman went right ahead with her daring tax-cut proposals, even declaring that if they didn't work, she wouldn't run for reelection.
This guy has obviously got to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.