Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Mark Steyn] Evolutionary Figure: Steyn on Francis Crick
Atlantic Monthly via Steyn Online ^ | October 2004 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 10/13/2004 4:39:56 PM PDT by NovemberCharlie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: johnandre

"Why, why, why can't I write that well...."

LOL, I sympathize! He's amazing, truly BRILLIANT in the Best British Sense of the Word. What I love especially about him is how he can write in all the different idioms of English so dead on, or spot on, on any subject. Tremendous!


21 posted on 10/13/2004 7:33:21 PM PDT by jocon307 (Don't let Australia down: Re-elect President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie

Hooah!


22 posted on 10/13/2004 10:20:29 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Amen!


23 posted on 10/13/2004 10:20:50 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie

bump


24 posted on 10/13/2004 10:38:36 PM PDT by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Brenda Maddox wrote about Rosalind Franklin and this is a most interesting part of the history of discovering DNA.

"Without her knowledge, another Randall research associate, Maurice Wilkins, showed some of her X-ray diffraction photographs of DNA to James D. Watson, whereupon Watson, with Francis Crick, succeeded in determining the molecule's structure, and published in Nature magazine on April 25, 1953 an article describing the double-helical structure of DNA. Articles by Wilkins and Franklin illuminating their X-ray diffraction data supporting the findings of Watson and Crick were published in the same issue.

Franklin died of ovarian cancer in 1958 in London; it was almost certainly caused by exposure to radiation in the course of her research. Wilkins, Watson, and Crick were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962.

Much has been written on the role that Franklin played in the discovery of the structure of DNA. While it is clear that her work was an important basis for determining DNA's structure, the correct deduction itself was mostly the work of Watson and Crick. Whether, given time, Franklin would have reached the same deduction in the rather competitive race (including such figures as Linus Pauling) to discover the structure of DNA is unknown. Watson has stated that Franklin should have discovered the structure of DNA as much as two years before he and Crick did.

Perhaps Franklin wouldn't have made the final discovery, but she did all the x-ray work that they used, and died of ovarian cancer from it in 1958. Watson, Crick, and the less-than-ethical Wilkins received the Nobel Prize in 1962. And none of them were ever gracious about her contributions. And they wouldn't have gotten there without her work.

25 posted on 11/04/2004 9:56:24 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Wat is this story about??? Umm like I dont get it?


26 posted on 08/29/2011 6:11:01 PM PDT by asdfzxcv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson