Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly Hit with Sexual Harassment Suit
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html ^

Posted on 10/13/2004 1:31:31 PM PDT by scottybk

O'Reilly in trouble!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: leprechaun; mackris; oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 921-938 next last
To: scottybk

You're honor, I bent over to pick up a pencil and I heard this voice say, "Who's looking out for you baby."


41 posted on 10/13/2004 1:36:57 PM PDT by NavVet (“Benedeict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viet-Boat-Rider

ALRIGHT!


42 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:04 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: scottybk
O'Reilly says this is an attempt at extortion. Read the suit he and FNC filed today for more details.
43 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:08 PM PDT by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

I hope it's true and that O'Reilly gets what he deserves for being such an as*hole. Let's see how many lefties come running to BO's aid.


44 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:15 PM PDT by MichelleWSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

You're probably right. I am not O'Reilly's biggest fan, but since he doesn't toe the MSM Democratic line, the MSM hates him.

It's probably piled high and deep in crap.


45 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:28 PM PDT by RockinRight (John Kerry is the wrong candidate, for the wrong country, at the wrong time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

HURRY!!!!! lets overook the obvious.


46 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:48 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The economy won't matter if you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets

Perhaps now he will begin to have some small regard and sympathy for the many thousands of businesses that get shaken down every year by gals who have discovered this cash machine.


47 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:53 PM PDT by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

For a moment I had this horrific feeling that Michael Moore was the plaintiff in this lawsuit.


48 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:54 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fooman

OMG O'reilly -- SHAME ON YOU


49 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:54 PM PDT by WashStateGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

Wow, I was wrong. I guess it -IS- all about the "O"...


50 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:56 PM PDT by blogbat (Holding Out for 2008, but still voting in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

Just a question about venue: Why would a sexual harrassment suit have its initial filing the the state supreme court? Wouldn't it be in a district court first?


51 posted on 10/13/2004 1:37:56 PM PDT by ArmedNReady (George Bush has wood for the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

O'Reilly takes a sharp left this year & what's the first thing that happens? A Monica appears out of nowhere. Its mandatory when your a liberal.


52 posted on 10/13/2004 1:38:43 PM PDT by Linda Sandoval (Hockeymom for Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

I think this is a media stunt to hype his new book for kids....


53 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:03 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

Sounds very plausible, and seems obvious that the woman tape recorded lengthy stretches of conversation with O'Reilly.


54 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:12 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pushforbush
O'Reilly's credibility is shot.

Yeah, his credibility is shot because of the BS he has been saying on his show, not because someone filed an unproven complaint against him. If any of it is proven, then it will hurt his credibility more, but until then, its just a bunch of allegations.
55 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:18 PM PDT by Thrusher (The timing of this post is suspicious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

You've got to be kidding.


56 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:32 PM PDT by cwiz24 (Unnngh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

Maybe he did all this to get Clinton on his show because I heard the #1 guy he wants to interview on his show is Clinton. The two Bills can now relate.


57 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:34 PM PDT by Imaverygooddriver ( What`s the difference between Windows XP and John Kerry? Windows XP works once in a while.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

No, it isn't.


58 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:40 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24
Something is telling me that there is going to be a lot of spinning in the no spin zone.
59 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:41 PM PDT by inpajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scottybk

Ah ha. So this is Hannity's big announcement. He's
going to take over for BoR, while BoR wages this
little legal war.

And Bill Clinton is unavailable to help Kerry because
BoR has hired him to assist with legacy restoration.

In any event, now that the cat is out of the bag, it
will be interesting to see if BoR changes his tune.
If he was being blackmailed to conduct on-air spin,
that presumably will come to a halt, and those still
watching will see the "real" BoR emerge.

I'm not sure I care to see the real BoR, so keep us
updated with reports.


60 posted on 10/13/2004 1:39:53 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 921-938 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson