Undersetimate for loser in 2000 = no way to poll for vote fraud
i thought rasmussen had the closest one for "00? Any idea about them?
Yep, I would think the more pertinent question would be which pollsters were closest in 2002...in a post 9/11 world.
Conventional wisdom was that the Republicans would lose seats because they were in the WH, but just the opposite happened. Did any of the pollsters pick up that trend pre 2002 election results?
He completely changed his poll methodology after 2000.
"Of All The Steaming Turds Out There, Which Turd Stinks Less?"?
TOP FIVE in 2000!
Zogby underestimated Bush by 2, had Gore accurate.
Washington Post had Bush accurate, Gore underestimated by 3.
Pew underestimated Bush by 2; underestimated Gore by 5.
Newsweek underestimated Bush by 3; underestimated Gore by 5.
NBC/Wall Street Journal underestimated Bush by 1; underestimated Gore by 4.
Maybe some polsters are better at national races(Zogby)
and other polsters are better at statewide races(Mason/Dixon)
Has it been determined that the Bush DUI actually had an impact on the campaign?
I think that this is a great business to get in to. You can be wrong 100% of the time and still get paid!
I think the real pro's of polling work internally for the candidates and have the numbers dead on.
During the next 20 days it will be very interesting to see where the candidates hold rally's.
I've offered my home on Maui to 'W' for his use to win Hawaii! LOL!
The mediawhores did it once. They'll definitely do it again (see: Rather, Dan). At least the DUI was real. It can be a fabrication this time. It doesn't need to be true. It just needs to get Kerry elected. I've posted this theory several times on various threads over the past months. These people will stop at nothing. My guess is the Thursday before the election.
bump
Harris has been the closest historically.