Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock on the California Propositions
http://www.tommcclintock.com/ ^ | October 4 | Tom McClintock

Posted on 10/10/2004 9:24:49 PM PDT by AVNevis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Great Guide by Sen McClintock through the many propositions this year. The only one I disagree with him on is 60. Not that I oppose what it would do, but the legislature should have opposed Prop. 62 the right way; by working to defeat it instead of placing a competing measure on the ballot. No on 60 and 62 is my position. And in effect by voting No on 62 you are voting for 60 anyway since if both 60 and 62 fail the primary election system will stay the same; just like the legislature wants.
1 posted on 10/10/2004 9:24:49 PM PDT by AVNevis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

OUTSTANDING


2 posted on 10/10/2004 9:32:02 PM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

bump


3 posted on 10/10/2004 9:34:15 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

This was posted before; but thank you


4 posted on 10/10/2004 9:34:31 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis; kellynla; Rabid Dog; Carry_Okie
We're from the government and we're here to help.

bttt

TM would make a great governor.

5 posted on 10/10/2004 9:38:04 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

So, who's going to run for Feinstein's open Senate seat in 2006: Tom McClintock or Condi Rice???


6 posted on 10/10/2004 9:44:39 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
I would say Tom-but he needs to run for Luitenant Governor. Feinstein is too riskey for Tom to bet his political future on beating her. She is fairly popular.
7 posted on 10/10/2004 9:46:47 PM PDT by AVNevis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

There's a strong chance that she retires in 2006. She will be 70 in 2006, putting her at 76 at the end of her next term if re-elected. If it's an open field, I'd love McClintock to get the nomination. If Feinstein's running, I say go with Condi; after all, you cannot go from Left to Right without moving through the center.


8 posted on 10/10/2004 9:51:29 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis
70. De-politicize Tribal Gaming. YES.

Not so fast there, Tom. McClintock has been the recipient of Native American Casino largess. Maybe he supports 70 for the right reasons, and then again, maybe he don't.

9 posted on 10/10/2004 9:53:11 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

you read my mind plutarch. I'm taking him with a grain of salt on the gambling stuff.


10 posted on 10/10/2004 10:42:26 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis
McClintock Versus CAGOP and/or Da Govahnatah

The following are the measures where Tom, Ahnold and/or the CA Gop are in disagreement:

60A

CaGOP (Yea): This amendment would earmark the proceeds from any disposal of surplus state property for repayment of the Economic Recovery Bond, Proposition 57 (approved in the March 2004[Ends]

Ahnold, unknown
Tom, Nay, see top post

*****

65

CaGOP (Nay): T[SIC] measure would require voter approval for any legislation that provides for any reduction of local governments’ vehicle license fee revenues, sales tax powers and revenues, and proportionate share of local property tax revenues.

Ahnold, unknown
Tom, Yea, see top post

*****

70

CaGOP (Nay): This is the Indian-sponsored initiative to require the Governor to offer renewable 99-year gaming compacts to Indian tribes with no limits on the number of machines or types of games. Tribes would pay the state corporate tax rate in lieu of any other fees, taxes or levies. Tribes would not pay taxes if the state permits non-tribal casino-type gaming.

Ahnold, Nay
Tom, Yea, see top post

*****

Additionaly, Tom, Ahnold, and CaGOP make three-of-a-kind on the following:

Yea on 64
Nay on 66
Nay on 68
Yea on 69
Nay on 72

That exhausts what Ahnold states on his site. All unspecified positions of CaGOP are in agreement w/ McClintock.

11 posted on 10/10/2004 10:54:58 PM PDT by zeppenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

Thanks for posting.


12 posted on 10/10/2004 11:04:53 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch; Mount Athos

Tom McClintock has been speaking up for Indian causes since well before they had money to throw around.


13 posted on 10/10/2004 11:07:52 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

Ping for later election guide material and Tom McClintock fan.


14 posted on 10/10/2004 11:18:19 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (Kevin O'Malley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

That's all well and good but what happens if 62 passes?


15 posted on 10/11/2004 12:04:14 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

If both 60 and 62 pass, the one that gets the most YES votes will become the law of the land... the other goes into the dustbin of history.

Therefore, we must vote YES on 60!


16 posted on 10/11/2004 7:22:58 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis
The Governor agrees with State Senator McClintock on three more propositions:

CA: Governor opposes telephone tax for hospitals, two other measures

17 posted on 10/11/2004 9:33:46 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
Then our cause was defeated and we graciously concede defeat. Simple enough?
18 posted on 10/11/2004 9:48:36 PM PDT by AVNevis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
The reason I say No on 60 is I do not want to send a message to the legislature that if they don't like a propositon they can just place a competing measure against it. If the legislature opposes something they should oppose it the right way; by working for the proposition's defeat, not by placing a contradictory proposition on the ballot.
19 posted on 10/11/2004 9:51:18 PM PDT by AVNevis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

Bump so my wife can print this.

Someone is a little bit dumb about cut and paste here.


20 posted on 10/11/2004 9:59:22 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Drivers of SUVs without brush scratches should be horsewhipped! ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson