Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States want fuel tax replaced - Fee-based sytem monitors car and computes charges
Houston Chronicle ^ | October 4, 2004 | LUCAS WALL

Posted on 10/04/2004 1:24:20 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

PHILADELPHIA - Paying your road taxes in the future might depend more on how much you drive than how much gasoline you pump.

Texas is among a group of states researching how to replace the fuel tax with a fee based on the number of miles traveled — making every road a virtual tollway. Transportation officials from across the world discussed the concept here at last month's annual meetings of the trade groups representing the highway and tollway industries.

Fees for miles traveled would be measured by Global Positioning System receivers embedded in vehicles. The system would track which roads a motorist uses so the virtual tolls could be distributed to the appropriate agency.

Each jurisdiction could set its own per-mile fee. Data would be downloaded from vehicles monthly for billing, or could be transmitted at service stations in lieu of the gas tax.

Jack Lettiere, New Jersey transportation commissioner, said most states are falling short of collecting enough gas-tax revenue to meet mobility needs and they desire a new funding mechanism.

"We're hoping this is a theory that can go into practice," Lettiere said at the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials meeting. "It has a lot of useful benefits."

Researchers love the idea that driving taxes could be adjusted to promote or discourage certain actions. The system could charge more per mile during peak hours, for instance, or add a surcharge for heavy trucks and sport utility vehicles.

Those promoting a mileage-based approach to highway taxes contend driving should be metered and billed according to use.

"Why shouldn't transportation be seen as a utility like electricity, water, etc.?" Hal Worrall, a consultant for Transportation Innovations Inc., asked during a panel at the International Bridge, Tunnel and Toll Road Association conference. "It's perceived as free in America and thus produces a large demand."

David Forkenbrock, director of the University of Iowa Public Policy Center, has been working on a model for four years. His research is funded by 15 states, including Texas, and the Federal Highway Administration.

As more hybrid and alternative-power vehicles are built, Forkenbrock said, gas-tax collections will suffer.

"A tax at the point of purchase is inferior to user charges at the exact point of travel," he said, explaining the growth of toll roads in recent years.

Oregon has already tested a mileage-based charge. It starts a pilot project next year with 280 volunteer drivers in Eugene, who will be exempt from fuel taxes in exchange for paying their per-mile assessment.

713-362-6832

traffic@chron.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: autos; cars; driving; gas; oil; roadtax; taxes; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Welcome to the collectivists' New World Order...


101 posted on 10/04/2004 12:10:50 PM PDT by lodwick (He that meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"its a blatant attempt to force the peasants back into mass transit and riding bicycles"

....and when they succeed at this, they'll just find another way to make up for all the 'lost' revenue of people avoiding the taxman.


102 posted on 10/04/2004 1:05:58 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I did not phrase my original post very well, I am as bothered by the idea of big brother tracking me as you are.

My point is that highways are not a natural freedom, they are the result of other people's time and money and their unfettered use shouldn't be taken as a right - because that is where someone else's obligation begins.

I think government tracking for surveillance purposes is an unreasonable fetter, and hope enough people agree it would not become reality. But I would have no problem with the economics a pay by usage system - but I suppose that in reality that is inseperable from the surveillance aspect.

103 posted on 10/04/2004 6:50:15 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
"Yeah, my wife has Onstar in her car! OTOH, being a frugal type, she didn't renew it this year."

Are you sure it's not working?

104 posted on 10/05/2004 4:18:00 PM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: fightu4it

If just paying for it makes it work, I have to assume the Onstar people can just turn it back on, or more likely, just start monitoring it whenever they want. Sure, I guess you are right, it's probably still on.

I wonder how easy it is to disconnect.


105 posted on 10/05/2004 6:10:48 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson