Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NADER BACK ON ARKANSAS BALLOT (Democrats lose lawsuit, delay ballots to troops)
Associated Press | August 29, 2004

Posted on 10/02/2004 5:17:20 PM PDT by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2004 5:17:21 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

My browser automatically plugged in the wrong date for the article. The article was published October 1, 2004.


2 posted on 10/02/2004 5:19:54 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Go Nader!


3 posted on 10/02/2004 5:23:32 PM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Does anyone know what has happened in Wisconsin? He was on the ballot and then off. The decision was being appealed.


4 posted on 10/02/2004 5:25:16 PM PDT by meeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Uh, where does it say ballots to our troops would be delayed?


5 posted on 10/02/2004 5:25:30 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

6 posted on 10/02/2004 5:26:08 PM PDT by Mike Bates (You're getting drowsy. You will buy my book, you will buy my book, you will buy my book. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I wonder why ANYone is worrying or thinking about Nader and his 1%. And I think the 1% POSSIBLE vote is a vast overestimation of what he will get.

It's all about the Electoral College anyway, not the popular vote. And, if the talking heads are to be believed, Nader's voters come from both sides, don't always vote (the young) and won't make that much difference even in the "battleground" states. And THOSE are dwindling in number as November 3nd approaches.

Hmmmmm

7 posted on 10/02/2004 5:27:12 PM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Nothing the Democrats try surprises me anymore. They will do anything to gain power. I really think they would try to overthrow the government by force if they thought they could get away with it.


8 posted on 10/02/2004 5:30:48 PM PDT by kddid (Optimism for all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Nader should do well in Arkansas. He can relate because his family tree doesn't branch.


9 posted on 10/02/2004 5:34:58 PM PDT by DugMac ((Regan Rules))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kddid

I just don't get it. The dimocrats are spending all this money fighting in the courts to keep Nader off the ballots. His teeny tiny weenie 1% hardly makes it worth the trouble. They are just bullies that's all.


10 posted on 10/02/2004 5:35:09 PM PDT by sarasotarepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Why don't we start a pro-Nader 527?


11 posted on 10/02/2004 5:35:42 PM PDT by wolfman23507
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

The polls in Wisconsin between sKerry and GW are still quite close. Nader is getting 6% of the vote. He is currently off of the ballot (I think). That makes a huge difference in Wisconsin. I don't think the people voting for Nader are going to hop on the Bush band wagon!


12 posted on 10/02/2004 5:37:01 PM PDT by meeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
Uh, where does it say ballots to our troops would be delayed?

See the previously posted articles about this lawsuit for that info.

13 posted on 10/02/2004 5:40:33 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meeps
How can ANYone be for Nader?

That old windbag is SUCH an enormous waste of time. I didn't think ANYONE with an I.Q. of over 85 listened to him anymore.

Oh well, perhaps in Wisconsin there is a fondess for stinky old cheese.

14 posted on 10/02/2004 5:41:22 PM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meeps
State Supreme Court Puts Nader on Ballot
15 posted on 10/02/2004 5:41:50 PM PDT by Monitor (Gun control isn't about guns; it's about control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarasotarepublican
No, the Democrats are not just engaging in bullying. In 1976 the Dems spent about $100,000 just to knock Gene McCarthy off the ballot in New York. (In today's dollars, that would be about half a million.) They did that because polls were showing that McCarthy would draw about 2% and Carter had a lead on Ford of less than 2% at that time.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "And the Debate Winner is -- Lemony Snicket"

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

16 posted on 10/02/2004 5:43:57 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

That's good news for the Naderman. I wish Democrats would stop whining about Nader joining this election. I don't recall having ever heard of a Republican bitching about Peroutka's or Badnarik's candidacy.


17 posted on 10/02/2004 5:44:50 PM PDT by Kurt_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monitor

Cool- thanks for the update. I just moved Wisconsin back into the Bush category!


18 posted on 10/02/2004 5:46:33 PM PDT by meeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

Nader, sKerry, Nader, sKerry.........if you are planning on voting for either one of these guys, something is really wrong with you. I'd much rather have them vote for Nader, who doesn't stand a chance, than sKerry. It's the "Power of Cheese!"


19 posted on 10/02/2004 5:48:20 PM PDT by meeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meeps

Back on the ballot as of 30September court ruling. See votenader.org


20 posted on 10/02/2004 5:48:52 PM PDT by donozark (I fought at the Battle of Kimchi Ridge. The gas...the gas...it was HORRIBLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson