Bush was absolutely pathetic and inept at the debates. I'm a HUGE supporter, but I called it. I KNEW Skerry would take the lead. Bush was disgusting. Not so much with his stuttering and stammering, but for letting Skerry get away with his lies. Time and again... And calling Bush a liar in front of all of America, and NO RESPONSE.
It's NEWSWEEK! So who am I suppose to belive? Newsweek or CNN/Gallup, and Rassmussion that show NO Debate bump for Kerry?
Why do some many Freepers suffer from McCainism?
"McCainism" A mental defect where the poster feels the need to constantly run down his own side while never pointing out the gross flaws in the opposition. Mental defect caused by the fraudulent belief that being hyper critical of their own side shows poster to be wise and intellectually sophisticated. Cure: Massive does of mockery for their doom and gloom pomposity.
Man, you guys got no guts. Now you know how the dems felt for the past few weeks.
Buck up, it's one poll, one snapshot (and 2 others show no change). There are 3 debates and 4 weeks left. People can change their mind in a heartbeat. The people who changed that fast will change again in a second.
Let me give you an example. The morning after the debate on good morning america they interviewed 5 people who were supposedly "undecided" who saw the debate. The interviewer asked, "Who has now made up their mind based on this debate?" Two people raised their hands, both for Kerry. The interviewer said, "So this debated changed you from undecided to Kerry supporters? They both nodded yes. Then she started questioning one of them, a woman. The woman said, "There's at least a 60% chance I'll vote for kerry, and 40% bush."
So this brain-damaged "undecided" voter apparently didn't understand the question, which was: Who has *decided* who they are going to vote for based on this one debate. Her answer to further questioning revealed she is, in fact, still UNDECIDED, and merely slightly leaning toward Kerry 60/40. Many, if not most, of the undecideds fit in this category. They're brains are random number generators, whatever they see the day before the debate will swing them, or they simply will never decide and won't vote at all.
The debate is a setback but not a disaster by any means.
Bush was disgusting??? We obviously watched different debates. A HUGE supporter might have chosen a different word.
But hey, maybe that's how you really feel, morally sickened.
Kerry's another matter, and since this word has a French root, it fits. :)
dis·gust ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ds-gst)
tr.v. dis·gust·ed, dis·gust·ing, dis·gusts
To excite nausea or loathing in; sicken.
To offend the taste or moral sense of; repel.
n.
Profound aversion or repugnance excited by something offensive.
I agree. I was listening to Bob Brinker on "Money Talk" today. Someone called and was bashing Bush on his tax cuts to the "rich". Bob Brinker, who is a mild manner guy, blew up and explained those tax cut was to stimulate the economy. The plan behind it was to have those people take their tax cuts & go out & spend it thus stimulating the economy.
It was a simple response , but very effective. I just don't P. Bush doing that. I see conservative radio talk show host explainiing what he ment or adding to what he said to help explain, but I don't see Bush or the Republicans doing that very well.
I am voting for Bush, but like I said before I will be very surprised if he wins.