You can spin it anyway you want.
The fact is Bush could have won this one in a walk.
Something was done to him. He was sabotaged. He was systematically under-prepped and over-cautioned and obviously over-tired.
Kerry has billions.
Rove sold our President down the river for a swiftboat load of cash.
It's NEWSWEEK! So who am I suppose to belive? Newsweek or CNN/Gallup, and Rassmussion that show NO Debate bump for Kerry?
Why do some many Freepers suffer from McCainism?
"McCainism" A mental defect where the poster feels the need to constantly run down his own side while never pointing out the gross flaws in the opposition. Mental defect caused by the fraudulent belief that being hyper critical of their own side shows poster to be wise and intellectually sophisticated. Cure: Massive does of mockery for their doom and gloom pomposity.
(Get a GRIP people........SHEESH!!!)
Oh please. You're actually suggesting that Kerry paid Rove to cause Bush to lose?
"Bush could've won this in a walk."
Man, I don't know where you get your confidence with Bush as a speaker. Geez, he's a great president, but as an orater he's poor. How anyone could've thought that he would beat Kerry in a debate is mind boggling. Whoever on the Bush team agreed to 3 debates is an idiot.
What is this supposed to mean?