To: kattracks
My theory is Bush went "soft" to get women on board. It may be smart strategery that may end up paying long term political dividends. Bush will take a tactical loss to secure the big prize.
2 posted on
10/01/2004 1:10:41 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
My theory is that like Clinton v. Dole GWB hung back on solid numbers.
4 posted on
10/01/2004 1:15:51 AM PDT by
Helms
(nu-ance : [French, from Old French, from nuer, to shade, cloud, from nue, cloud, from Vulgar Latin ])
To: goldstategop
I do not think it is a tactical loss. I think it was a perfect set up. Everybody claimed that Kerry won, just based on style, but after two hours, it wass a draw now that people started looking at substance. By the time it is fully digested, it would have been lethal for Kerry.
Global Test, giving nuclear material to Iran and ..... in a nutshell surrendering.
To: goldstategop
My theory is Bush went "soft" to get women on board. It may be smart strategery that may end up paying long term political dividends. Bush will take a tactical loss to secure the big prize.
I don't feel it was a loss. He further damaged Kerry's credibility. Kerry simply had no comeback for any of his flip-flops. Kerry just nodded his head like a buffoon.
It is Cheney's role to attack. It will be fireworks come Tuesday.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson