[Paleo Conservative]

Last Saturday, The New York Times, which has not yet formally endorsed a presidential candidate, published an editorial that could have passed for a piece of Kerry campaign literature.

I will take this opportunity to plug the 100^th thread that I have posted on Free Republic.

L.A. Times May Break Tradition, Make Choice for President

[MeekOneGOP]

The Times editorial went on to say that “It is absolutely not all right for anyone on [President Bush’s] team to suggest that Mr. Kerry is the favored candidate of the terrorists.” But shouldn't the real question be "Do terrorists in fact prefer one candidate over another?"

Yeah, just because Arab Media websites have posted that Iran supports Kerry for president and other such postings have endorsed him, such as North Koreans having parades "Kerry for President", etc. ......

And just because Kerry himself said he has been in contact with 'Foreign Leaders' .....