Aren't they liable for injury or damages if something happened? That in itself should be enough and besides, I thought they made some sort of agreement where they could retrofit "piecemeal" over the course of a few years because of the fact that it is so expensive to do all at once.
"Rents are already so high in downtown SLO that retrofitting would put the rents way to high for anyone to afford, so the buildings would end up empty."
That is because they refuse to build any type of housing. Being a college town doesn't help either...
"It's a vicious circle. I'm glad I'm gone. I sold my paid-for house there and fled to the Midwest, where I bought more than twice the house for half the money. Nice feeling."
Yeah I just recently moved to the East Coast. I can't believe how cheap housing is here. You can almost sell your car in California and buy a house with the money out here. Depending on what you drive, of course.
"Aren't they liable for injury or damages if something happened?"
I doubt it. I suspect that the commercial landlords have all sorts of disclosures and stuff the renters have to sign that relieves them of responsibility. The buildings all have warning signs on them, which everyone ignores, of course. Phooey on 'em.
There are good reasons for that, my friend.