We can debate a number of things.
September 11 was the breaking point with me as far as abiding selfish "Philospher Kings". You get kicked to the curb. With prejudice.
Let's just say that you won the debate because I don't even know what in the hell you are talking about anymore.
You've called me a bunch of names, now you're "kicking me to the curb", okay ... you've convinced me. I'm 100% wrong. My opinion is almost always swayed by such tactics.
Forgive my ignorance. I began to suspect I was wrong when you called me a NUTJOB (in all caps no less), and when you called me a "punk", I realized that nobody who used such tactics could be anything other that correct. The logic was simply indisputable. The "DemoRAT" was the real wakeup call. The Ad-hominems made me see where I where you were right, and where I was clealy, clearly mistaken.
Whew, that was a real eye opener. Thank you for pointing out the error in my logic.
I shall now fight to open the borders.
(I simply can't figure out why the illegal lobby just doesn' t simply call everyone "punks" and sway them to their side of the debate in a similar manner.)