[Barlowmaker]

If you think half a million illegals slipping over the border in the year is sovereignty, the word has no meaning.

If those 500,000 came here legally on work visas, would you be satisfied?

[radicalamericannationalist]

That is a separate issue. You stated that we have full sovereignty. If our borders are so porous that half a million people cross them illegally, then you are wrong.

As to your "change the issue" question, no I would not as that would depress wages for U.S. workers.

[Publius6961]

If those 500,000 came here legally on work visas, would you be satisfied?

I would.

If they did not print the "visas" themselves, and the "visas" are not convertible to residency under some delusional "amnesty" or other-weasel-word mechanism, and if the concept of "anchor baby" was also explicitly excluded.

Else why even pretend that the concept of legal immigration still exists as something other than a vague outdated concept?