Skip to comments.DAVID SHAW: RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod' not LIBERAL..?
Posted on 09/26/2004 4:58:32 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
...Now longtime Los Angeles Times Media Critic DAVID SHAW, who was one of the first to write in a column that MONICA-GATE was "Just about SeX" is today reporting about CBS News' Reporter DAN RATHER:
At 72, RATHER has lost none of the hard-charging, go-anywhere, do-anything determination to get the story that marked his rise to the top of the network news hierarchy. But now that drive has taken him to the abyss. (Wasn't it Dallas, Texas TV Reporter DAN RATHER that told the world the JFK had officially been declared dead, before JFK had been?)
"It wouldn't surprise him," SHAW says "if RATHER is a liberal, but he says after a dozen or so interviews with RATHER over the years, the veteran news anchor has never hinted at having an ideological bias." (Say WHAT?)
"Will RATHER be forced out of his CBS News anchor chair?" SHAW goes on to ask.
NEWSMAX.com's CARL LIMBACHER adds that while SHAW is not seeking RATHER's ouster, many journalists believe that if precedent and reputation mean anything to CBS, the decision is clear.
But NOT to Los Angeles Times Media Critic DAVID SHAW..?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
I will NEVER FORGET personally telling DAVID SHAW, after my return from the 1st Major Battles of the Vietnam War, about the Anti-U.S. Mis-reporting of the Vietnam War by CBS News Reporters WALTER CRONKITE, DAN RATHER and MORLEY SAFER. A young DAVID SHAW was a Liberal supporting the Anti-War stance of then Presidential Candidate ROBERT F. KENNEDY and I of course argued against him with the CLARITY of Freedom's side.
DAN RATHER subverted our Fight for the Freedom of others in Vietnam long ago and is now subverting the Fight for our own here at home.
And this is what Los Angeles Times Media Critic DAVID SHAW should have been reporting all along about people like CLINTON-CASTRO Friend DAN RATHER to the American People ...but has neglected to.
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer / Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965
SHAW: RAHTER's 'Shoddy, Slipshod' Work Let to 'Aysss'
Only a far leftwing kook could say that Rather is not liberal.
MEL's -PASSION- was sparked by -WE WERE SOLDIERS-
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer
Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965
'MODERN DAY HEROES: In Defense of America'-
Hit:.. 'Resource Center'
Hit..: 'Aloha Ronnie'
This guy thinks everyone but he and his fellow reporters are dolts.
The MSLM are learning, but they still have a ways to go.
...And now with the CLARITY of an Internet that I didn't have to fight Media Giants with upon my return from Vietnam in 1966..
...we are ALL qualified Media Critics for CLARITY here at Freerepublic.com...
...no matter WHO feels they can still snow us into confusion via the Media.
...It's been a long time in coming...
...but come it has, BIG TIME..!!!
GOD is GOOD
You all get it anyway, but -- I (unfortunately) live in La La land and know this poor excuse for a human being, David Shaw. He is one of the sleaziest creatures to walk this earth. When the LA Slimes got caught in a major log roll, running a huge puff-piece article on Staples Center without admitting they were one of the main investors, guess who they assigned to "investigate" the nascent scandal--? Thas' right, David Shaw. What a slime pit that paper is!!
...And now the Head of CBS has appointed the former Head of the same Associated Press that was awarded a bogus PULITZER Prize for its false story about a Massacre at the Bridge of NO GUN RI, that NEVER happened, by a Columbia University PULITZER Prize Committee Headed by this same then Head of the Associated Press...
...to now investigate a lying DAN RATHER..?
Associate Press must return its bogus -NO GUN RI- PULITZER
keep it out there.. post it on a web page and keep it going ...
WHEN too many WORDS IN a TEXT are CAPITALIZED the result is DISTRACTING. I RECOMMEND that MAYBE you TRY to RE-format SUCH ARTICLES so THAT they ARE easier on THE EYES.
He's doing what CBS was doing a week ago. Admitting everything except for the blatantly obvious. Why? Because it would show that his enemies on the right are right.
Thanks for the heads up, Ronnie.
I am so sorry they haven't learned, are carelessly hurting another generation of veterans (and the free world).
What will it take before they understand the enemy they serve hates freedom, their lives - their very souls?
Ugh!! You and I need to form a Slimed by David Shaw Survivors' group!!
Thank you for your service and for speaking out.
Hey, Buckhead, here's a flower 4-U.
Thanks for the ping!
...even DAN "No Agenda" RATHER publically agrees with DAVID SHAW.
DAN RATHER: White House Out to 'Smear; Me
We're making progress. I suppose this is the equivalent of the insanity plea.
Yup, they're still crazy...
...after all these years.
This is some of what I shared with a then young Long Beach Independent-Press Telegram Investigative Reporter & friend, DAVID SHAW, upon my return from the 1st Major Battles of the Vietnam War:
'WE WERE SOLDIERS ONCE...& YOUNG'...4 FREEDOM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.