Skip to comments.
Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran
Chicago Tribune ^
| September 25, 2004
| David Mendell
Posted on 09/25/2004 6:24:56 AM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Running for president already? ...
2
posted on
09/25/2004 6:26:21 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
("F" Stands for FLIP-FLOP ...)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Wow. He has moments of sanity. I'm stunned to be honest.
3
posted on
09/25/2004 6:27:27 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Like any good rat once they "talk" about something the problem is solved! Don't hold your breath for Alabama or any other high profile rat to actually "do" anything about anything except welfare needs for their constituency. that's all they really care about.
4
posted on
09/25/2004 6:31:06 AM PDT
by
keysguy
(Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
"U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama suggested Friday that the United States one day might have to launch surgical missile strikes into Iran and Pakistan to keep extremists from getting control of nuclear bombs. Obama, a Democratic"
do do doood doo 4 years down the road for president....
Barack Obama 9/24/2008: "I never said that! What I said was that I would vote to give the power to the president to .....blah blah blah"
5
posted on
09/25/2004 6:33:38 AM PDT
by
lyingisbetter
("Let's wait Kerry" or Let's go Bush")
To: BunnySlippers
6
posted on
09/25/2004 6:34:00 AM PDT
by
Blogger
(The only difference between Terry McAuliffe and Michael Moore is about 300 pounds)
To: Blogger
I'm thinking VP. Hilary/Obama.
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
That's the day I'll be taking a sabbatical from my job to campaign against that witch.
8
posted on
09/25/2004 6:41:01 AM PDT
by
Raffus
(Liberals are in sane!)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Hilary/Obama
vs.
Rudy, Rudy, Rudy
9
posted on
09/25/2004 6:45:01 AM PDT
by
lyingisbetter
("Let's wait Kerry" or Let's go Bush")
To: BunnySlippers
Obama is the perfect description of an "honest" politician: when he's bought, he stays bought.
10
posted on
09/25/2004 6:46:29 AM PDT
by
Liz
(The man who establishes the reputation of rising at dawn, can sleep til noon.)
To: lyingisbetter
Rudy is good, but not very conservative socially.
11
posted on
09/25/2004 6:49:06 AM PDT
by
Raffus
(Liberals are insane!)
To: Liz
He's from Harvard, dontcha know. Staying bought can't be cheap.
12
posted on
09/25/2004 7:09:54 AM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(Dawgs for Bush!)
To: Crazieman
Yes- his comment is a sane assessment of potential futue conflict.
What would be INSANE would be to want someone like Obama and his party to be making the decisions about when, where and how-
We sure wouldn't want the Clinton State Department, the Clinton SECDEF, or the Clinton targeting team at the helm, would we?
13
posted on
09/25/2004 7:14:21 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Obama conceded that such strikes might further strain relations between the U.S. and the Arab world. Huh?
Does O(s|b)ama think Iranians are Arab?
14
posted on
09/25/2004 7:17:32 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
("John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource our national security.")
To: B Knotts
Does O(s|b)ama think Iranians are Arab? Or the Pakistanis for that matter.
And another thing. "Surgical strikes" is the Clinton formula. Low risk, low cost--and low probability of accomplishing anything meaningful (think of the Tomahawk strikes on Osama). The real question for Obama et al is: what if surgical strikes won't work? If you fire your cruise missles, and all you accomplish is to "hit a camel in the ass" (to paraphrase W)--what then? I think we all know the answer.
To: BunnySlippers
16
posted on
09/25/2004 7:28:46 AM PDT
by
mdmathis6
(The Democrats must be defeated in 2004)
To: Land_of_Lincoln_John; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
Obama suggested Friday that the United States one day might have to launch surgical missile strikes into Iran and Pakistan to keep extremists from getting control of nuclear bombs. This guy is almost as bad as Kerry.
1. Pakistan is becoming a strong ALLY to the US.
2. Pakistan has already tested it's Nukes back in 1998
17
posted on
09/25/2004 7:37:02 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
(John Kerry: Giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the US since 1970.)
To: Thebaddog
Yeah, but the deal includes reciprocal BJ's from his campaign financiers. The money keeps coming as long as Obama toes the line, and kneels when required.
18
posted on
09/25/2004 7:43:16 AM PDT
by
Liz
(The man who establishes the reputation of rising at dawn, can sleep til noon.)
To: Crazieman
Yep - this is the second issue I have heard about him coming out on the "right" side in a public statement -
He is against homosexual marriage (although he doesn't have a problem with "civil unions".
And now he thinks wacking Iran wouldn't be a bad idea....
Of course, he is a RAT so he is just as likely to give a speech on the opposite side of the same issues tomorrow.
19
posted on
09/25/2004 8:13:55 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Islam - the cult of Satan - The DemocRAT Party= Acolytes of SATAN)
To: OXENinFLA
I can't pin point it .. but I don't like, nor trust Obama
20
posted on
09/25/2004 8:55:28 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson