Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What hit me is that if cBS really cared about the validity of this story, wouldn't they have called Bush (who could verify the documents) instead of Kerry?
1 posted on 09/23/2004 8:46:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
"Lockhart has staunchly denied that he ever discussed the forged documents with Burkett,"

Right, they just talked about the weather, under water basket weaving, and the writings of Albert Camus.
2 posted on 09/23/2004 8:50:46 PM PDT by jpf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Since Burkett is "unimpeachable", I do believe See?BS! is well and truly screwed. Right?


3 posted on 09/23/2004 8:51:46 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Let's hope that BB's new lawyer forces See_BS to keep all the video that they shot - would prove interesting to view!!


4 posted on 09/23/2004 8:51:54 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Drip, drip...

Now Lockhart will have to answer more questions about this.


5 posted on 09/23/2004 8:52:47 PM PDT by sargon (How could anyone vote for the socialist, weak-on-defense fraud named John Kerry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

CBS did call the Bush campaign -- three hours before they broadcast the story. Then they claimed that "no response" from the Bush campaign made them think the story was true.
6 posted on 09/23/2004 8:52:52 PM PDT by JoeBob2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This story is fun to follow... but Burkett sure is a putz, ain't he?


7 posted on 09/23/2004 8:54:35 PM PDT by Gunder (Jenna's a good time, but Barbara is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

> "He snipped [my interview] apart to cover them," he
> told the Telegram. "That's all that that evening news
> was - to find a fall guy. And it was me."

The legacy media is crooked. Gasp. What a stunning loss
of innocence. And all the poor guy was trying to do was
bring down a President with documents he wasn't sure
were authentic.

> Lockhart tried to "convince me as to why I should
> give them the documents."

Amusing, but we need to treat this with the same respect
that we gave the memos, unless Burkett has evidence, by
which I mean "real" evidence.


8 posted on 09/23/2004 8:54:42 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

who cares now?

It is now time for the FBI to look into this. Hopefully, Ashcroft will direct them to do so, and with the proviso that all agents and prosecutors involved are longterm career employees.


9 posted on 09/23/2004 8:55:07 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
LOL, now they have to attack Burkett so as not to call Lockhart a liar. Therefore, defending their beloved CBS is made even more difficult since CBS relied on this man the left will now have to call a nut.

Too funny.

14 posted on 09/23/2004 9:00:00 PM PDT by SoCar (Support the Swift Boat Vets for Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Bush could not verify Killian's personal memos...only a dead man could do that ....

CBS did not ruin Burkett...Burkett ruined himself...He didn't ruin CBS..CBS(Rather) got drunk on the idea of smearing the President and acted to promote their agenda...Lockhart isn't acting like the smooth operator he is if he spoke to Burkett without checking him out..googling his name would have helped.

Mapes is a fool in love with promoting her agenda to fall for Burkett's story of"seeing Bush's files in a trashcan"


17 posted on 09/23/2004 9:01:53 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This is the smoking gun if true, don't you think??


19 posted on 09/23/2004 9:02:57 PM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; All

I have a sneeking suspicion that Burkett may attempt suicide before this is all through :o(


20 posted on 09/23/2004 9:03:36 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; All
I have a sneaking suspicion that Burkett may attempt suicide before this is all through :o(
24 posted on 09/23/2004 9:04:44 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Keep talking, Burkett!


26 posted on 09/23/2004 9:05:16 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; All
I have a sneaking suspicion that Burkett may attempt suicide before this is all through.

He might even succeed at it :o(

28 posted on 09/23/2004 9:05:55 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

"But with Burkett now claiming otherwise, Republicans have their first evidence "

So now Republicans are calling Burkett their "unimpeachable source ?

Back off quick !!!


29 posted on 09/23/2004 9:06:15 PM PDT by RS (Just because the Pajama Posse is out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This is sooooo much fun! A 3-way cat fight between SeeBS, the kerry campaign, and the evil DNC headquarters! And every once in a while, some desperate RAT says, "Well, the docs may be forged, but what's in them is true!" Some dunce wrote a letter to the editor to that effect today. To me, that's like saying "This $20 bill is counterfeit, but it's still real money."


32 posted on 09/23/2004 9:07:21 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Well, well, well. The thlot pickens. Lockhardt--pro that he his--said the discussion was about how Kerry could combat [Swiftvet] criticism. No lie. The way to combat Kerry's abysmal post-war activities--which were court-martial offenses--was to implicate Bush in a potential court-martial offense (aka, the "documents").


35 posted on 09/23/2004 9:11:06 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

But.... but..... but....I thought Lockhart said they never discussed the documents. ;^)


36 posted on 09/23/2004 9:11:21 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Dan Rather ruined my reputation in front of 70 million people

Given the recent ratings, more like 70,000 but whose counting?

41 posted on 09/23/2004 9:14:41 PM PDT by Camachee (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson