Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burkett: Lockhart Asked Me for Rathergate Documents
Newsmax ^ | Newsmax

Posted on 09/23/2004 8:46:45 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Edited on 09/24/2004 2:23:34 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Burkett: Lockhart Asked Me for Rathergate Documents

Former National Guard commander Bill Burkett has become the first player in the CBS forged document scandal to implicate John Kerry's presidential campaign, telling the Fort Worth Star Telegram that top Kerry aide Joe Lockhart pressed him to turn over damaging evidence on George Bush.

During a single phone conversation with Lockhart, Burkett told the Telegram that he suggested a "couple of concepts on what I thought (Kerry) had to do" to beat Bush.

Story Continues Below

In return, he said, Lockhart tried to "convince me as to why I should give them the documents." Lockhart has staunchly denied that he ever discussed the forged documents with Burkett, though he confirmed that a conversation had indeed taken place in a call arranged by "60 Minutes" producer Mary Mapes.

But with Burkett now claiming otherwise, Republicans have their first evidence of Rathergate wrongdoing that directly implicates the Kerry campaign.

Burkett also complained that "60 Minutes" anchorman Dan Rather tried to set him up as a "fall guy" in the forged document scandal during his mea culpa broadcast on Monday.

"He snipped [my interview] apart to cover them," he told the Telegram. "That's all that that evening news was - to find a fall guy. And it was me."

"Dan Rather ruined my reputation in front of 70 million people," he added.

Burkett's former lawyer said Tuesday that the controversial Guardsman was preparing a lawsuit against CBS.

*********Additional Information**************
**Original Newspaper Account Corrected*******

CBS source denies plotting with Kerry

By Jack Douglas Jr.

Star-Telegram Staff Writer

This article has been corrected from the version published in the newspaper and online Friday morning to reflect that Bill Burkett was referring to conversations with CBS when he said, "They tried to convince me as to why I should give them the documents." The earlier version incorrectly reported that he had discussed the documents with Joe Lockhart of the Kerry campaign.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billburkett; burkett; coverup; danscam; democrats; dnc; lockhart; mapes; memogate; napalminthemorning; rathergate; seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Dan Rather ruined my reputation in front of 70 million people

Given the recent ratings, more like 70,000 but whose counting?

41 posted on 09/23/2004 9:14:41 PM PDT by Camachee (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Naw I think Robin Rather is Lucy, Burkett is Linus.


42 posted on 09/23/2004 9:14:45 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
What hit me is that if cBS really cared about the validity of this story, wouldn't they have called Bush (who could verify the documents) instead of Kerry?

How could Bush verify the documents? These were allegedly from Killian's "personal file", remember. How would Bush know what Killian had put in his alleged CYA file?

CBS has been stubbornly obtuse about the White House's refusal to "challenge the authenticity" of these documents. The fact is, how could they (or anybody) know what Killian wrote for his own personal file?

Thus, one can't effectively challenge and deny the content. Instead, the only basis for challenging the authenticity of these documents is their production process -- and 'tweren't no typewriter.

43 posted on 09/23/2004 9:15:41 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155

Well--a lot of them are Italian, and Machiavelli is worth talking about and LEARNING.


44 posted on 09/23/2004 9:16:03 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If Burkett is Lucy Ramirez, will the shoes match the purse?

Maybe not, but at least he wouldn't have had to keep the documents in his pants and sox if he does have a purse.

45 posted on 09/23/2004 9:16:06 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Laughed out loud--sorry, it deserves full credit.


46 posted on 09/23/2004 9:17:42 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
This is BIG. Let's get the grand jury quick before the Hillery shredders start working. Or people end up at Fort Marcy Park.
47 posted on 09/23/2004 9:17:44 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

> This time I don't doubt Burkett.

Caution is advised. I don't see any immediate reason
for him to lie about this. He's definitely speaking
like he thinks CBS is out to get him.

Possibly he took exception to the DNC denials on the
topics of discussion.

In any case, the real questions are whether or not
the general public will hear of this, and grasp what
means (DNC-CBS collusion), and if so, how they'll
react.


48 posted on 09/23/2004 9:18:48 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Lockhart has staunchly denied that he ever discussed the forged documents with Burkett, though he confirmed that a conversation had indeed taken place in a call arranged by "60 Minutes" producer Mary Mapes.

Ah yes, now who believes THAT scenario?

ring

Burkett: Hello?

Lockhart: Hello, is this Mr. Burkie?

B: BurKETT. The name is BurKETT.

L: Oh, Mr. Burkett. Mary Mapes of CBS News asked me to call you.

B: Yeah, yeah. Say I got some really good ideas about the Swift Boats Vets.

L: Yeah ...

B: I mean, I think that Kerry ought to really go AFTER them. Y'know?

L: Uh huh ...

B: Call 'em liars and uh, stuff like that ...

L: Yes ...

B: Cause, um, y'know ... that would be a really good idea ... just come out and say they're liars, um, and ... um, ... they're not telling the truth ...

L: I see ... Well, thank you very much.

B: Liars ... bam ... hold nothing back! ...

L: And Mary Mapes wanted me to call you for this?

B: You bet!

L: And she thought I would be .... interested ... to hear this?

B: Yeah. Well, she owes me a favor y'know?

L: Oh sure sure, I know how that goes.

B: Well ... I guess that's it.

L: Okay ...

B: Liars. Just have John call 'em liars.

L: Yeah. Good work Burkie. We'll get on that right away...

B: BurKETT. The name is BurKETT.

L: Yeah, Burkett. Well goodbye.

B: Bye.

Click

Lockhart: Now what the hell was that about?

49 posted on 09/23/2004 9:18:49 PM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
Amusing, but we need to treat this with the same respect that we gave the memos, unless Burkett has evidence, by which I mean "real" evidence.

Hmmm... Interesting take... I believe that Lockhart has said that "the phone call" lasted for only two or three minutes. So, there might be evidence in the form of phone records, which could validate or disprove at least that piece of Lockhart's story (of course, that evidence would be in Lockhart's possession, not in Burkett's hands).

Mapes, also, could add pieces to the puzzle by coming clean on exactly what she told Lockhart and/or other Kerry campaign insiders, but that is not very likely.

Inquiring minds might want to know not only the duration of that call, but whether or not there were other calls between Lockhart and Burkett, and/or between Lockhart and CBS, as well as who Lockhart may have called immediately after talking with Burkett. Sometimes, in the absence of an actual intercept (as an aside, I wonder whether such a thing exists), the traffic analysis can fill in some of the blanks...

50 posted on 09/23/2004 9:18:58 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Pardon me whilst I dance on the grave of Dan Rather's career...

TAP TAP TAPPITY TAPPITY TAP TAP TAPPITYTAP TAP TAPPITY TAPPITY TAP TAP TAPPITYTAP TAP TAPPITY TAPPITY TAP TAP TAPPITYTAP TAP TAPPITY TAPPITY TAP TAP TAPPITYTAP TAP TAPPITY TAPPITY TAP TAP TAP!

51 posted on 09/23/2004 9:19:53 PM PDT by SerpentDove (It's Christmas in September.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpf

Foucault?


52 posted on 09/23/2004 9:20:37 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This just keeps getting sweeter and sweeter. It's all the talk at work and social situations. This is getting to be the self destruct Hari Kerry campaign.


53 posted on 09/23/2004 9:20:41 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

What a cast of characters. Burkett is a mental patient. Mapes is a whackjob feminist b*itch criticized by her dad. Lockhart is a lying, spinning paid whore. Burkett's scumsucking attorney is going to shakedown CBS (although we like that part of the story). Buckhead is an Atlanta attorney who brilliantly recognized the forgery but was somehow too brilliant so it is a conspiracy by the President's political strategist. There are a group of rodents somewhere underground who are crapping their pants and watching their guy go down in flames. And, finally, there is a TANG pilot who received an honorable discharge and now leads the Free World in the War on Terror.


54 posted on 09/23/2004 9:22:14 PM PDT by doug from upland (Dan Rather is a journalist like Michael Moore is a pole vaulter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

Last night at work (I work part time at a local retailer) some one tried to pass fake ID and fake checks for a purchase. The police were call. One of my fellow employees asked why the police were in the parking lot ....I told them "we'd been CBSed!"


55 posted on 09/23/2004 9:24:57 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
And there a whole bunch of people who once belonged to the "silent majority", who are "not going to take it anymore."
56 posted on 09/23/2004 9:27:14 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
This is front page news, but doubt the old media will run with it. Kerry campaigner directly involved by CBS to persuade and procure the documents from Burkett. Kerry has surrounded himself with idiots and saboteurs. How can anybody with some resemblance of common sense trust this man's judgment and still vote for him.
57 posted on 09/23/2004 9:27:19 PM PDT by avant_garde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpf

Forbes.


58 posted on 09/23/2004 9:27:53 PM PDT by Redcoat LI ("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jpf

Fu--eD Alex?


59 posted on 09/23/2004 9:27:57 PM PDT by Phinanceguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

> ... traffic analysis can fill in some of the blanks...

Things we aren't likely to get.

We are going to get massive entertainment value, it
appears. Burkett's statement is now in enough places
(and just being on Drudge would suffice) that the
DNC will probably have to respond to it, and further
impeach the CBS source.

That may get Burkett thinking that both CBS and the
DNC are out to get him (and they may be), and who
knows what his next step will be.

Dispassionate consideration of detailed scientific
evidence does not seem to be on the program for some
time to come. In the meantime, grab a beer.


60 posted on 09/23/2004 9:28:43 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson