Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Source's Attorney: "Bill Burkett Just Got Burnt by Dan Rather"
TexasInsider.org ^ | 9-22-04

Posted on 09/22/2004 5:07:18 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: Lancey Howard
There is some weird kind of bait-'n-switch diversionary tactic going on here - - some kind of game. This whole thing sounds really fishy to me, like Burkett is being set up somehow.... For exactly what, I don't know yet.

I've said since Sunday that Burkett is the Oswald-like patsy who has been bounced around in exactly the same Texas style Lee Harvey was by octopus operative Guy Bannister.

But it is critical to remember that David Van Os works for the Democrat Party, not Bill Burkett. He will throw Burkett overboard in a heartbeat to protect Kerry and the scumbag Democrats. Van Os takes his orders from Kerry's handlers, and Bill Burkett doesn't know it yet, but he is toast.

Van Os is doing two things: (1) Adding confusion to the original source of the fabrication so that any sorting out will go beyond Nov. 2; (2) He is encouraging Burkett to sue CBS so that whoever winds up being Burkett's attorney can squelch his conversing w/the media by reminding him, "You can't say a thing lest you risk your upcoming civil trial." Of course, they'll never be one. Right at the point of a trial, CBS suddenly settles out of court. Part of the settlement is that Burkett has to stay quiet. Burkett is legally paid off; all of this is bumped out of the immediate frame of the media; Burkett's mouth is zipped; and confusion reigns as each points fingers at someone else.

101 posted on 09/23/2004 12:31:27 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Thanks for the reply - - your points are good ones.
By the way, I have zero faith in this two-man commission CBS put together. Wasn't Thornburgh involved in the theft of Inslaw from the Hamiltons? Regardless, I smell a whitewash coming.

The whole thing will end up a mess. Our only hope to make hay before the election is lots of investigative reporters nosing around and a lot of pressure and vigilance from us pajama people.

Regards,
LH


102 posted on 09/23/2004 12:51:28 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Wasn't Thornburgh involved in the theft of Inslaw from the Hamiltons?

My info is that Thornburgh is a man of faith. The media is already reporting that the other guy is a Rather buddy who was warmly toasted by Rather.

103 posted on 09/23/2004 12:58:16 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

mark for later


104 posted on 09/23/2004 1:02:13 AM PDT by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I think most of us believe he typed them himself.

Burkett did not manufacture these.

The Dems and Kerry campaign knew about them before Burkett had them.

I suspect They dumped them on Burkett, covered their tracks, and and tipped CBS off where to get them

105 posted on 09/23/2004 6:12:56 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: randita
Referring to someone as an "unimpeachable source" is hardly casting them in an unfavorable light.

How about Max Cleland calls Rather and tells him that a guy named Burkett has some documents... There's your "unimpeachable source" ...Cleland, not Burkett.

106 posted on 09/23/2004 6:17:44 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
There's your "unimpeachable source" ...Cleland, not Burkett.

No way. Cleland has been a screw-up who carelessly blew off his own limbs. He rode a horse called sympathy to the Senate, then lost after Georgians saw what he was really like. Rather isn't that dumb so as to call Cleland "unimpeachable."

He rather calls himself "unimpeachable," but has lashed his reputation to Mapes. If she were to talk, Rather would be toast. He believes it's a safe bet. She won't got out without Dan going out, but they could go together if they have to. In such case, they intend to carry their secrets into their cushy retirement years.

Mapes wanted to be a Woodward or Bernstein and come around next time with Rather-like credentials to aid her liberal causes. Rather wanted to get back at the Bushes and prove he was just the guy to be able to do it (like the Mujahedeen with their Stingers bringing down the might Soviet transport planes Dan so exhilaratingly talked about). He compares himself to Uncle Walter and wanted his own Tet Offensive report to repaint the landscape.

HF

107 posted on 09/23/2004 7:51:22 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

IMO, here's that shoe.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1224349/posts

Make sure you read the whole thing. Picture how Rather will spin this. The October scoop will have everyone on their knees at Rather's brilliance.


108 posted on 09/23/2004 11:02:16 AM PDT by GoLightly (If it doesn't kill ya, it makes ya stronger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson