I knew Colorado was being misrepresented in the polls.
Looks like Bush coattails possible for Coors. Cheers!
Colorado is not a battleground state, regardless of what many lefties want us to believe.
Everything showed a Strickland victory in 2002 and Allard won easily. I believe Pete Coors will win this time and Bush will carry Colorado by near if not double digits.
Presidential race - good news.
Senate race - bad news.
This poll explains why Kerry decided about a week ago to pull resources out of the state, even as other polls had the race closer than this. He is also pulling resources out of Arkansas (no surprise), Louisiana (no suprise) and Missouri (surprising). The map for Kerry continues to get smaller and smaller.
And why won't someone poll Colorado about the EV-split initiative?
That's what really matters here...
Who cares, if things go as planned Bush gets 1EV from CO. Thus winning the election with 324EV instead of 325 =)
Some recent threads on Colorado polling numbers have shown a small lead for the President. Never thought those polls offered honest data. 51% for Bush sounds moree like it.
Btw, Pete Coors is gonna beat Salazar too.
When John Elway introduced Bush, arms around him..it was OVER!
Ping!
poll ping
So what's this 46%-45% BS we've been hearing about everywhere for the past few weeks??
God, how I wish W poll numbers would be 50+ all across the the country! I was surfing the clymer channels this evening and I noticed how much airtime Lurch is getting compare to W! The WHORESanchors keep telling the audience how much Lurch has picked up momentum, and he is on offensive slaughtering W ...blah, blah, blah...in this past week. Giving him a good lift and a good week without having to defend the basta**! I pray W staff isn't asleep at the wheel this evening! They need to speak loud and clear against the reinstating DRAFT lie, Lurch and his staff are footing out! If W staff continues to be silent on this matter the LIE will eventually stick to W...NOT GOOD!I'm afraid it's beginning to take root...Not GOOD!
how can this be????? how can other polls have it a "horse race," and this one have a CLEAR LEADER? stop the madness!!
It is unconstitutional, because it is a referendum. The constitution very specifically says that the state legislatures, and only the state legislatures have the authority to determine the method by which electors are chosen! The Colorado legislature very specifically rejected such a system.
As long as large states like California, New York and Texas do not change from a winner take all system, it is not in the interest of small states like Colorado to do so.
I also don't want to forgot to mention that it also violates the federal election code. The method by which the electors is selected must be in place before (as I recall at least six days prior to) the date the electors are chosen which is election day. Even if the a referendum were a valid mechanism of determining the method of allocating electors, this referendum is too late to affect the 2004 election. This referendum should be fought in court and removed from the ballot.
Article II.Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.