Replies

We have been incredibly effective for 3 straight years - Any suggestion that we have to be 100% effective always....or our strategy needs to change.....again, is simply not understanding the reality of a real war.

Congratulations, you're still fighting that strawman -- and losing to it I might add. Life must be very confusing for you.

Yawn . . . we do not have to be "100% effective." No one said that (except you). However, we DO have to prevent the kind of spectacular attack hinted at in this article and if you think such an attack would not change our strategy (and rightfully so), you're outta your freekin' mind. Dubya is a quite a bit smarter and more adaptable than you're giving him credit for.

So, with your logic if we were to have another airliner hit a building in the United States and it killed 2000 to 5000 people.....Or of a US Tanker truck was used to blow up a building or blown up during a large event and again 2000 to 5000 people were killed.

You think this should alter are strategy for fighting the war on the ground within Iraq and other Middle-East Countries? - You think this should change our policy of taking the fight to our enemies daily and nightly? -

Give an example of how you think we would change our fighting? - Come on, smart guy. It is clear you have no idea how actual combat works -

Uh, we could just CHANGE our strategy and it will be more effective - Ridiculous. - We are hunting the enemy 24 hours a day. Our soldiers are going balls to the wall. How would you change our strategy.

Your comments are the EXACT words we will hear from the Democrats and MSM the very second an attack takes place in America - "GWB war on terror as failed!!" - "Our strategy is wrong" , blah, blah, blah.

As I said, in the REAL WORLD....in WAR....bad things happen....(to all sides) - There is no way we will be 100% effective from now until the end of time - (understand this) -

But again, don't just shoot off your mouth - Give some examples of "HOW our strategy needs to change" -

Carpet bombing? - More use of air-power? - Small tactical nukes? - What are you suggesting??? -

We are fighting the most effective unconventional war that has EVER been waged in the history of man.....YET YOU are claiming "something will need to change if they hit us again" - Please.....Let the real warriors protect us....Not wishy-washing hand-wringers like yourself.

Yawn . . . we do not have to be "100% effective." No one said that (except you). However, we DO have to prevent the kind of spectacular attack hinted

And for the record - You are saying we have to be 100% effective against a major attack....Just as I have said you have said - (wait a second, are you John Kerry??) - You claim you didn't say something, then in the next sentence say it!

You clearly say we have to prevent any spectacular attack from happening or our military strategy would need to change(which means we have to be 100% effective against preventing this attack?) - Does it not?