Skip to comments.
Atlantan Challenged CBS Documents First (Buckhead)
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^
| Sunday, September 19, 2004
| Tom Baxter
Posted on 09/18/2004 8:51:41 PM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Surprisingly nice article.
1
posted on
09/18/2004 8:51:42 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
Appoint Buckhead to SCOTUS!
2
posted on
09/18/2004 8:53:26 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
To: kristinn
Why the hell are these media morons writing as if you need some sort of twenty year certification course to determine that these look like obvious forgeries?
3
posted on
09/18/2004 8:55:03 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Chief Justice Buckhead has a nice ring to it.
4
posted on
09/18/2004 8:56:09 PM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
To: kristinn
That is a nice article. Seems like the Atlanta-Journal is proud of Buckhead's involvement.
To: kristinn
Predict CNN camera crew on his doorstep within 48 hours.
To: kristinn
This is just too sweet for words!
7
posted on
09/18/2004 8:57:28 PM PDT
by
Sunshine55
(Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
To: Paleo Conservative
At least a Federal Judgeship.
8
posted on
09/18/2004 8:57:39 PM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
To: kristinn; Jim Robinson
He also wrote an amicus brief for FreeRepublic.com in a breach of copyright case brought against the Web site by the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post. So that's how they figured out who he was.
9
posted on
09/18/2004 8:58:37 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
To: Crazieman
They're trying to cover up for the fact that a bunch of twenty and thirty-year veterans in a print medium didn't catch it.
10
posted on
09/18/2004 8:58:38 PM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(I voted for Bush... before I voted for Bush.)
To: Crazieman
Why the hell are these media morons writing as if you need some sort of twenty year certification course to determine that these look like obvious forgeries?I think your average reporter is not too bright.
11
posted on
09/18/2004 8:59:37 PM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
To: kristinn
Buckhead:
serves on the advisory board of the Southeastern Legal Foundation,
was involved in a challenge to the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill
part of the Arkansas disbarment proceedings against former President Bill Clinton.
12
posted on
09/18/2004 9:01:02 PM PDT
by
rface
(Ashland, Missouri - monthly donor /bad speller - I am a FReeper not a BLOGGER)
To: Paleo Conservative
What an amicable fellow. I knew there was a reason I liked him.
13
posted on
09/18/2004 9:01:03 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
On Democratic blogs, meanwhile, questions were being raised about how "Buckhead" could have analyzed the typefaces so quickly, and whether the questionable documents could have been a Republican plant.
LOL! And once again the DUmmies were wrong... Thanks Buckhead, you did our city proud.
To: kristinn
Why is it suspicious to the Dems that somebody not officially charged with examining the documents noticed the fraud in less than four hours?
Just for one thing, nothing is ever their own fault. In fact, the way Democrats think, it doesn't know how many Democrats knew beforehand that Dan Rather was going on the air with fishy evidence. Against that, if even one Republican anywhere can be shown to have known in advance, it's a Republican plot.
They haven't found that Republican yet, of course, but they're looking for him and they will find him.
To: kristinn
It is a good article -- thanks for finding and posting it.
16
posted on
09/18/2004 9:01:29 PM PDT
by
Angelwood
(FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's Vast Rt Wg Conspiracy))
To: Jim Robinson; Howlin; backhoe; Buckhead
17
posted on
09/18/2004 9:01:37 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: kristinn
Has it been determined that Burkett offered "the same information" to Cleland, or simply that he offered "some" information? I wouldn't be surprised if it was the same set of memos, but we should be careful about asserting things before they have been definitely established. At this point it looks likely that he's the one who faxed the memos from Abilene, but I don't think we have proof yet.
To: kristinn
ANYBODY old enough to have used an old Royal, or an IBM typewriter once in awhile, as I did, would have figured this out, looking at the PDFs from CBS. ANY TYPEWRITTEN 1972 "MEMO" with slick proportional spacing should have set off alarm bells to anyone over 45. I guess I should have gone into rocket science, because I knew they were NOT original the minute I saw them. Rare skill, I guess.
19
posted on
09/18/2004 9:01:47 PM PDT
by
RBMN
To: kristinn
Alas, the elephant is still in the room...
20
posted on
09/18/2004 9:02:19 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson