Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS VS. ITS OWN EXPERTS
NRO ( Kerry Spot) ^

Posted on 09/16/2004 12:31:23 PM PDT by Bushruffneck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: watsonfellow
Read carefully the wording of the professional opinion of James Pierce. He doesn't really authenticate anything.

All he really says is that the signatures on the photocopied questioned documents are consistent and in basic agreement. THIS WOULD IMPLY THAT THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH EACHOTHER, SINCE HE MAKES NO REFERENCE TO ANY DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE PROVEN TO BE REAL SIGNATURES OF JERRY KILLIAN. NOWHERE DOES HE STATE THAT HE COMPARED THE SIGNATURES ON THE CBS DOCUMENTS TO ANY REAL SIGNATURES OF JERRY KILLIAN.

Similarly, look at the wording he uses regarding the type face. All he says is that the typed-face designs are strongly similar to samples that indicate the same typed-face existed prior to the date in question on th photocopied documents. SIMILAR DOES NOT MEAN THE SAME. ALL TYPED DOCUMENTS HAVE SOME SIMILARITY WITH EACHOTHER AND ALSO WITH COMPUTER GENERERATED DOCUMENTS, BUT THEY DON'T MATCH EACHOTHER.

Which leads to his opinion, "based on what he knows and has examined in the PHOTOCOPIED QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS, the documents are authentic"

IN SUMMATION: ALL HE SAYS IS THAT THE PHOTOCOPIED QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS COMPARE WITH EACHOTHER, THEREFORE THEY ARE AUTHENTIC QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS.

HE WAS SPEAKING IN "CLINTONESQUE"!!!!! (Probably to CYA, you think?)
21 posted on 09/16/2004 1:08:23 PM PDT by Flamenco Lady (Newly registered and proud to be with you all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

You type faster than I do! Great minds think alike!


22 posted on 09/16/2004 1:10:57 PM PDT by Flamenco Lady (Newly registered and proud to be with you all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

It is clear that the language in the memo was used in Texas during the time they are claimed to have originated. gotta give Dan that much.


23 posted on 09/16/2004 1:12:04 PM PDT by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bushruffneck
A fourth examiner, James J. Pierce, also continues to support the documents, the network said.

Your title is misleading.

However, the real question is: Has Pierce appeared in public/on camera to say he continues to support the document (or ever did)? Or is the only evidence that he does/ever did support them that "the network said" so?

24 posted on 09/16/2004 1:12:08 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Donate to the Swift Vets -- www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushruffneck

25 posted on 09/16/2004 1:15:09 PM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 8 month old son with Down Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

OH, I JUST REREAD THE MATLEY AFFIDAVIT TOO. HE IS SPEAKING CLINTONESQUE TOO.

ALL HE STATES HE DID WAS COMPARE THE SIGNATURES WITH EACHOTHER TOO. NOWHERE DOES HE STATE THAT THE SIGNATURES COMPARED WITH THOSE KNOWN TO BE SIGNATURES OF JERRY KILLIAN!


26 posted on 09/16/2004 1:17:41 PM PDT by Flamenco Lady (Newly registered and proud to be with you all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson