This could get interesting. Sayonara, Dan.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 last
To: Rutles4Ever
This is why it was so important not to watch just to get a list of advertisers to boycott. By watching they get ratings. Boycotting the show itself achieves a far better result: advertisers abandon ship like lemmings leaving the Titanic.
Numbers talk. If Rather generates ratings via controversy the advertisers will stay. If viewers abandon CBS out of disgust, there is NO reason for them to support this crappy network and they wont. ALL of our goals are accomplished and, further, we didnt have to suffer through the insufferable propaganda-filled Blather of CBS News, 60 Minutes, or any of their other worthless "news gathering" operations (e.g. circuses.)
If you want to send letters to advertisers, let one or two Freepers watch, get a list and them slam them with mail. But to watch them for that result is to undermine our cause: shutting down propaganda mills parading as news outlets by averting our "eyeballs".
284 posted on
09/16/2004 11:48:05 AM PDT by
N. Beaujon
(Take THAT CBS: A Boycott is a message they cannot ignore.)
To: Rutles4Ever
285 posted on
09/16/2004 11:48:37 AM PDT by
NYer
(When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
To: Rutles4Ever
we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalistSelf-righteous even as the ship's bridge slides under the water. Pukes.
289 posted on
09/16/2004 12:03:21 PM PDT by
Indie
(Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist... Hey CBS & Gunga Dan, America is laughing at you!
290 posted on
09/16/2004 12:04:20 PM PDT by
RJL
To: Rutles4Ever
Couldn't happen to nicer guy. And trailing 2-1 to one of the most loathsome talking heads in mediadom, Peter Jennings! You know, in "Bias", Bernie Goldberg predicted this was eventually going to happen- wish they could dole some of's Dan's "don't watch" over to Brokaw and Jennings.
293 posted on
09/16/2004 12:09:46 PM PDT by
trentk
(trentk)
To: Rutles4Ever
Rather can always get a job anchoring the Weekend Update segment on Saturday Night Live.
295 posted on
09/16/2004 12:18:43 PM PDT by
Argus
To: Rutles4Ever
" "Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist... of course"It's Not FAIR...WAAAAA..It's Just Not FAIR...WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Like a bunch of 2 year old kids.
296 posted on
09/16/2004 12:18:47 PM PDT by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: Rutles4Ever
other than San FranciscoThe center of strange world.
To: Rutles4Ever
"Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist. Are we not on the same planet? Dan has been a virulent critic of President Bush for quite some time. OF COURSE CBS News is perceived as anti-Bush!
301 posted on
09/16/2004 12:38:50 PM PDT by
John123
(Kerry wants to be the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces that uses spitballs.)
To: Rutles4Ever
San FranSicko! I wondered where Cap'n Dan was going after he was fired. Certainly don't want him back in Texas. Thought he might have to move to france!
306 posted on
09/16/2004 12:59:57 PM PDT by
SwinneySwitch
(A 4 month swift boat commander or a 4 year Commander in Chief, you decide.)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Are those documents authentic, as experts consulted by CBS News continue to maintain? Or were they forgeries or re-creations, as Knox and many others believe? "
--60 Minutes II website
Who are these experts that continue to maintain that the documents are authentic? Certainly not any of those that CBS has presented so far.
Also, notice that CBS doesn't acknowledge that many experts believe that they are forgeries, instead using the term "many others". Furthermore, CBS is now trying to shift from using the word "forgeries" to using the term "recreations". What is the difference? If they are presented as originals (including a signature), they are forgeries.
To: Rutles4Ever
"Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist..."You may think he is, if you like, but it's only your opinion.
To: Rutles4Ever
But but but the sponsors have all said they're not worried, that they're receiving negligible number of complaints and don't anticipate changing where they place their ads. So how can this be?
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
321 posted on
09/16/2004 1:54:19 PM PDT by
Bonaparte
(and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
To: Rutles4Ever
"Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist... Even the supposedly "smart people" at SEE BS are idiots.
329 posted on
09/16/2004 3:31:31 PM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
To: Rutles4Ever
"The audience appears to becoming polarized,"No, the audienced is becoming informed and the Old Media just can't get away with the crap they used to for so long.
339 posted on
09/16/2004 8:35:08 PM PDT by
EricT.
(Join the Soylent Green Party...We recycle dead environmentalists.)
To: Rutles4Ever
{sniff, sniff} What d'you smell, Big Daddy? Why, it's the smell of mendacity!
Tip o' the hat to Tennesee Williams.
340 posted on
09/16/2004 8:36:14 PM PDT by
Ciexyz
("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
To: Rutles4Ever
Journalism's Hall of Shame to induct two more, Rather and Mapes:
jayson Blair, New York Times
Steven Glass, New Republic
Jack Kelley, USA Today
Janet Cooke, Washington Post
Peter Arnett, CNN and NBC, MSNBC and National Geographic Explorer
Dan Rather, CBS
Mary Mapes, CBS
347 posted on
09/17/2004 8:33:15 AM PDT by
OESY
To: Rutles4Ever
is Don Henley on the "hasbeen rockers against Bush" tour? and if he is, will he perform "Dirty Laundry?" /rhetorical question
350 posted on
09/18/2004 9:12:00 AM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson