Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Section 2 would not be necessary if the federal government had no power over alcohol at the state level

If the passing of the 18th Amendment doesn't prove that it was necessary (as you claim) then neither does the inclusion of Section 2 in the 21st prove that it was necessary.

112 posted on 09/16/2004 8:15:59 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights

Go back to bed. You have no idea what you're talking about.


156 posted on 09/16/2004 9:06:46 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson