Posted on 09/15/2004 12:32:58 AM PDT by ambrose
Something I haven't seen much discussion on is her response to the problem that Staub is supposed to have exerted pressure on Killian in 1973, but Staub retired in 1972.
In the original Drudge report on this she is quoted as saying that then Staub must have applied the pressure in 1972 . . . ???? Was there even a question about GWB's physical in 1972?
Excellent observation. Appears she has an agenda too. Perhaps being coached?
My view is that someone morphed her verbal statements into forged documents.
The question is who had the eureka moment and briged the gap between the secretary as a source and a written document dispalying the information?
Rather of course knows. Death apparently will come before he reveals the fraud and forger.
She now claims that she remembers ......
My 86 yo mother remembers stuff that never happened everytime I talk to her. The only way she can live in the present is to try to make it relate to some past memory.
Forget the elderly....I'm less than half her age and have probably written thousands of memos on related subjects. No way could I relate with any detail "what" was in a memo 15 years ago....but she recalls 40 years ago?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.