Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Criticism of CBS, Rather intensifies
Washington Times ^ | 9/15/04 | Jennifer Harper

Posted on 09/14/2004 10:16:05 PM PDT by kattracks

Critics have gone beyond questioning the credibility of CBS anchorman Dan Rather.


    Some are now calling for his resignation, a boycott of CBS and a federal investigation just a week after Mr. Rather stepped before "60 Minutes II" cameras, claiming he had damaging memos that proved President Bush shirked his National Guard duty three decades ago.
    A small, initial chorus of suspicious Internet bloggers soon grew into a caterwaul of mainstream journalists who disputed Mr. Rather's claims.

[snip]

According to a statement yesterday, CBS "has mounted a steadfast defense" of the documents, with no comment about a New York Times report yesterday that detailed a "deepening concern" among Mr. Rather's anxious colleagues who want him to come clean and reveal his sources.
    "We have no reaction to that report. None at all," CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius said yesterday.


    Some believe CBS has done more than compromise its journalistic integrity, however.


    "Congress has held hearings on [radio shock jock] Howard Stern and 'wardrobe malfunctions' at the Super Bowl. It has held hearings on the networks' disastrous performance on Election Night 2000. Now a network is party to a fraud committed with the obvious intent of influencing an election. Where are the hearings?"


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2004 10:16:05 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yeah..Where are the hearings?.
2 posted on 09/14/2004 10:19:41 PM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"A small, initial chorus of suspicious Internet bloggers

Hey, pJ wearing bloggers! get it right! LoL Rather will be gone by the end of the week I bet at this rate the heat is being turned up.

3 posted on 09/14/2004 10:20:47 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones
Yeah..Where are the hearings?.

Here ya go:

Rep. Cox Requests House Rathergate Probe

4 posted on 09/14/2004 10:22:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"In other news from the black-eye network CBS, Dan Rather has produced memos showing Bill Gates demonstrated a beta version of Microsoft Word in the early 1970's. Experts are suspicious as to the validity of the papers, as the type of paper wasn't produced until the 1990's."

(A tangled web he weaves... Resign Rather, you're a disgrace to the news community!)

5 posted on 09/14/2004 10:24:33 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

6 posted on 09/14/2004 10:26:24 PM PDT by happydogdesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The vice keeps tightening...


7 posted on 09/14/2004 10:26:53 PM PDT by NewMediaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The la times hits 'em hard, too:

times

8 posted on 09/14/2004 10:27:05 PM PDT by Sunsong (John Kerry, who rose without a trace, with no accomplishments but his own advancement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

Hearings are a bad idea, imho.

If hearings are held about the news-gathering process at CBS, they will all stonewall, claiming journalists' privilege. Suddenly they will go from being bad guys to being heroes.

Better to let this scandal play out in the media. Everything will be revealed, I believe, and for Rather there's no way out: any day now, someone's going to leave him alone in his office with a revolver and a shot of whiskey.


9 posted on 09/14/2004 10:27:30 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Woohooo...here's more:

If the documents are proven to be fake, it will be a terrible, devastating blow," former NBC News President Larry Grossman told the Wall Street Journal. "People will be fired, the program loses its credibility and Dan Rather ends a distinguished career with his reputation besmirched."

Well the documents have been proven to be fake, so when's the resignation?

And if he refuses to resign, can you impeach a network broadcaster? :)

10 posted on 09/14/2004 10:28:11 PM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Critics have gone beyond questioning the credibility of CBS anchorman Dan Rather.

It's gotta' be tough for Dan to have a leg kicked off his throne by the surfs.

11 posted on 09/14/2004 10:29:16 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"If the documents are proven to be fake, it will be a terrible, devastating blow," former NBC News President Larry Grossman told the Wall Street Journal. "People will be fired, the program loses its credibility and Dan Rather ends a distinguished career with his reputation besmirched."

Sit down, Larry. I'm afraid I have some bad news for you. The memos have already been conclusively proven to be forgeries. There's no "if" here.

12 posted on 09/14/2004 10:30:13 PM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

Hearings are coming.

Rather is toast.

Kerry is toast.

And as the blogstorm rages, America is waking up to the idea that "Freedom of the Press" is now residing on the Internet!


13 posted on 09/14/2004 10:31:36 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Presstitutes beware. We are watching. We've found our voice. And we are strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JPJones
"...can you impeach a network broadcaster?"

He's already been "impeached." He just hasn't been removed yet. AFAIK, there's only one way to do that. Hurt the sponsors and keep hurting them.

14 posted on 09/14/2004 10:31:55 PM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: happydogdesign; PhilDragoo

OMG, we gotta send that Rather/Clown moving gif to "DNCBS!"

I'm sure they'll get a laugh out of their resident clown!


15 posted on 09/14/2004 10:35:27 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
If hearings are held about the news-gathering process at CBS, they will all stonewall, claiming journalists' privilege. Suddenly they will go from being bad guys to being heroes.

Yeah, I have to ponder that for a while, it might bring the rest of the MSM back to CBS' side...but still...

16 posted on 09/14/2004 10:35:45 PM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

Meanwhile, pundits seem to smell blood.

"CBS News and top anchor Dan Rather are digging in their heels — and just may be digging their own journalistic graves," a New York Post editorial said yesterday.

"If the documents are proven to be fake, it will be a terrible, devastating blow," former NBC News President Larry Grossman told the Wall Street Journal. "People will be fired, the program loses its credibility and Dan Rather ends a distinguished career with his reputation besmirched."

In a New Republic column, Andrew Sullivan said: "When a news anchor presents false information and then tries to cover up and deny his errors, he has ceased to be a journalist. I'd like to say that Dan Rather needs to resign from his profession. But, judging from the last few days, he already has."

To some, the damage is already done.

"Whatever credibility remains at CBS News is over. And so, possibly, is Dan Rather's career," Cal Thomas declared yesterday in his syndicated column.


17 posted on 09/14/2004 10:37:36 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Rather has been a disgrace to the news media for a long time. I stopped listening to his blather years ago.

While I wish he'd resign or be removed, I don't think it will happen.

I just like seeing people turn on him, and watching him squirm and slither.


18 posted on 09/14/2004 10:38:17 PM PDT by Theresawithanh ( Flush the Johns in 2004!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

Rather would never use a pistol; liberals hate guns. Besides, he's a coward and would most likely swallow a bottle of pills in girlie-man fashion.


19 posted on 09/14/2004 10:39:11 PM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Some believe CBS has done more than compromise its journalistic integrity,

CBS compromised its journalistic integrity many years ago; it has simply reached the point where it is undeniable.

20 posted on 09/14/2004 10:39:14 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson