Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Evening News: Questions Linger Over Bush Memos
CBS News ^ | Sept. 13, 2004 | Dan Rather

Posted on 09/13/2004 4:15:44 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2004 4:15:44 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
See-BS News in now forced to report accounts of NY Times and Newsweek investigating their own shoddy reporting..LMAO!!

What a comedown for the Tiffany Network, all the way down to partisan hacks.

2 posted on 09/13/2004 4:18:26 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Voice of Dan Rather, music playing:

"Free Republic honors so-called, fallen heroes. CBS News was once a mighty news organization that has now become synonymous with Weekly World News."

3 posted on 09/13/2004 4:20:19 PM PDT by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So the CBS website is more suspicious of the documents than CBS News is?


4 posted on 09/13/2004 4:21:38 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Can someone tell me where to find an ordained archpriest?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
1. CBS is acting more like a political party than a news organization interested in whether they may have gotten it wrong.

2. No provenance, no sale. Damning documents but no originals and no history.

CBS is starting to smell as putrid as their story.

5 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:39 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Mr. Blather also mentioned a "memo" acquired by USA Today that bolstered CBS's case. But it was too small to read and he did not read its contents.

I wonder if the same dem is shopping his forged documents to USA Today too?


6 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:43 PM PDT by GreyFriar (3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yeah, what gives with that? Has danrather approved that copy?
7 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:47 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
So, is this from CBS, or AP?

Whoever it is, is attacking Rather's credibility in a gentle manner.

I'm amazed that they can't use a bit of judgement and just say THE D@MN THINGS ARE FAKE!

8 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:51 PM PDT by narby (What's the provenance, Dan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They're starting to crack. I still expect the house of cards to collapse tomorrow or Wednesday. They can't sustain the hoax in the face of opposition from other MSM.


9 posted on 09/13/2004 4:22:51 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (This message prepared with MS-CBS Word 72 software)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
This was on CBS's website?!?!? Apparently, somebody didn't get the memo. And how about this?

CBS said it used several techniques to make sure the memos should be taken seriously, including talking to handwriting and document analysts and other experts who strongly insist that the documents could have been created in the 1970s.

Should be taken seriously? Could have been created in the 1970's? Not exactly a ringing endorsement from CBS News about...CBS News.

This article is just plain weird given Mr. Rather's performance tonight.

10 posted on 09/13/2004 4:23:43 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
This article is on the up and up... funny to see this when they just tried to deny every thing in this article on the show. I am thinking they are setting up two poor suckers to take the fall for them... saying we trusted these guys and they were wrong..

but then again.. hows come they still do if they are able to read this document they just released?

mmm..

11 posted on 09/13/2004 4:23:44 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalight

Dan has just earned his forced retirement come next March, there is no way CBS can keep him on now..


12 posted on 09/13/2004 4:26:12 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: narby

It was taken directly from the CBS News website, credited to both CBS and AP, and appears to use clips/commentary directly from tonight's broadcast.


13 posted on 09/13/2004 4:27:07 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
They're all toast...all of 'em.


14 posted on 09/13/2004 4:27:25 PM PDT by ErnBatavia ("Dork"; a 60's term for a 60's kinda guy: JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pete
document analysts and other experts who strongly insist that the documents could have been created in the 1970s.

WHAT document analyst said the could have been created in the 70's. I've only heard them quote the handwriting guy.

As for Strong, I think he's the perp who forged these, and they're relying on him to back them up. He's the only Kerry koolaid drinker who worked at the guard. He IS NOT a dis-interested expert.

15 posted on 09/13/2004 4:27:42 PM PDT by narby (What's the provenance, Dan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pete

Maybe someone should email the article to Danny Boy.


16 posted on 09/13/2004 4:28:09 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
WHERE DID THOSE MEMOS COME FROM? THE PHOTO CBSNEWS WILL NOT PUBLISH: DAN RATHER CAPTURED ON SURVEILLANCE VIDEO

17 posted on 09/13/2004 4:28:09 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil

My guess is that a DNC staffer typed up the memo from some scribbled old military notebook, still a felony in Federal court!


18 posted on 09/13/2004 4:28:16 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
Not gonna happen. There's only so much the other MSM will do against one of their own. See BS has trotted out enough experts to satisfy them.

Since the Kerry campaign woke from the dead on this issue, they now have other people's accusations to cover.
It's over, guys. Let's cherish the fact that Bush is 9 or so up in the polls, get back to our work in re-electing him, and wait for the next MSM coverup. Meantime, let's start introducing the voters to sKerry and Edwards' voting records.
19 posted on 09/13/2004 4:28:29 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
raised "th" superscript

Blatant lie... the "th" they're talking about was NOT "superscript", it was no higher than the other letters on the page. And it was in exactly the right position to be struck with a special "th" key made for a typewriter.

20 posted on 09/13/2004 4:28:45 PM PDT by Tamzee (Free Republic .... Partisan Pajama People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson