1 posted on
09/09/2004 5:48:13 AM PDT by
Loyalist
To: Loyalist
Western countries are committing suicide by allowing these animals (yes, animals) to immigrate.
2 posted on
09/09/2004 5:49:27 AM PDT by
Guillermo
(It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
To: Loyalist
an outraged local Muslim community condemned the agency for its cultural insensitivity Well then why didn't the "Sensitive Ones" offer to take the children.
3 posted on
09/09/2004 5:54:55 AM PDT by
PistolPaknMama
(www.cantheban.net --Can the "assault" weapons ban!)
To: Loyalist
... children's aid societies are plucking ever more young from the swelling tide of newcomers to Canada whose child-rearing practices sometimes clash with those of child-welfare agencies that frown on physical discipline of children.
Don't miss the nanny-state subtext. "Children's Aid" is after anyone who disciplines their children, irrespective of religion.
5 posted on
09/09/2004 6:15:59 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(The Notorious North Carolina Niceness Nazi ... Beware the Molasses Miasma!)
To: Loyalist
They're pissed because the Christian homes aren't doing a good job of teaching them how to strap on a belt full of bombs.
Improper muslim upbringing, doncha know. It's all for the children!
7 posted on
09/09/2004 6:22:34 AM PDT by
aShepard
To: Loyalist
staged a vigil outside its offices in protest. I assume this is after they staged a vigil outside the muslim parent's home in protest of how they took care of their kids in the first place, right?
8 posted on
09/09/2004 6:25:04 AM PDT by
jtminton
(<><)
To: Loyalist
Ann Godfrey, a spokeswoman for the St. Catharines agency, said the foster parents are trying to raise the children as Muslims.
Then, the article is wrong. They must not be a Christian family.
9 posted on
09/09/2004 6:45:33 AM PDT by
T.Smith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson