What sublime assholes!
1 posted on
08/20/2004 2:08:48 PM PDT by
johnny7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: johnny7
Dean is beginning to look like the sane one.
23 posted on
08/20/2004 2:30:21 PM PDT by
DaBroasta
(Attention people of color, 'rich white men' have controlled the democrat party since 1964)
To: johnny7
I simply can't believe the party of moveon.org and Michael Moore can have the bald-faced brass to even try this. Highly gratifying... ;-)
To: johnny7
We've all had those dreams where we're running as hard as we can but we're moving like we're running in water. That's what's going on here in the political sense. The dems want to commit character assasination against the Swift Vets in the worst way. They want want to unleash their attack dogs on John O'Neill & Company with orders to kill and devour until nothing's left but eyeglasses. They want to destroy these men and strike their names from public record and punish any man, woman or child that dares utter their names.
But they can't.
They can't because you don't attack a veteran without sustaining severe damage yourself, especially if your guy is technically in the same category as the guys you're attacking. It's kinda like being over-run by the enemy and setting the mortar to fire straight up. You're risking damage to yourself and those on your side, but you have no other option because the enemy is inside the compound and firing point-blank at you.
So what you do is snipe at the flanks. Go after the donor because he's not a vet. Go after Bush because he's the one that benefits. Do anything but go after the vets too vigorously.
Hey, who's that charging over the razor wire? POW's?!!.......
26 posted on
08/20/2004 2:36:27 PM PDT by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: johnny7
Seems to me the only evidence that needs to be stressed is the Dick Cavett interview.
O'Neill was debating Kerry many years before George W. Bush ever thought about politics.
O'Neill had a political opinion back then, and it's just been transferred to his work on the book and the ads.
28 posted on
08/20/2004 2:38:08 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: johnny7; MeekOneGOP
30 posted on
08/20/2004 2:40:05 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: johnny7
Can Kerry make a case that Bush broke the law?
Their purpose is not to mount a successful case in court. Their purpose is to use the court case to lead people to believe that Bush broke the law. This is propaganda right out of 1984.
34 posted on
08/20/2004 2:42:59 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: johnny7
Can Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry prove his allegation that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a group airing ads denigrating his service as a Navy officer in Vietnam, are nothing more than "a front for the Bush campaign"? In one sense, that may be an immaterial question if voters decide that the group is part of an overall anti-Kerry strategy that is approved or assented to by President Bush or his campaign aides.APPROVED OR ASSENTED TO? (Yes, I'm screaming.) I have officially heard it all now.
36 posted on
08/20/2004 2:49:04 PM PDT by
alnick
(Get thee to www.swiftvets.com and contribute to the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth.)
To: johnny7
Tad Devine is getting his connections of the Swift Vet Boats to Bush Cheney from The New York Times. Now, there's a paper known for its honesty.
Tad Devine needs to better educate himelf on Kerry's Senate record. Devine just doesn't want the truth out there.
40 posted on
08/20/2004 2:54:13 PM PDT by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
To: johnny7
How about a case against Kerry for overstepping his authority in asking the feds to pull the ads? Or how about the vets or Bush suing his sorry rear for bringing false allegations?
Moveon.org isn't associated with him in any way, shape, or form, huh?
To: johnny7
No wait, this is good. It is put up or shut up time. If Bush is behind the Swifties, he is violating campaign financing laws. In effect, Kerry is alleging that his opponent has violated the law. If you level such a charge, you had better be able to back it up. If he can't, then he should shut the F#&k up.
57 posted on
08/20/2004 3:16:33 PM PDT by
fhayek
To: johnny7
73 posted on
08/20/2004 3:36:47 PM PDT by
votelife
(Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
To: johnny7
"Can Kerry make a case that Bush broke the law?"
Can Bush make a case that Kerry isn't above the law?????????
76 posted on
08/20/2004 3:48:14 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(Scratches, bandaids, medals galore-back to the world-Kerry makes war look easy.)
To: johnny7
What scumbags. After a year or more of Soros funded ads throwing every lump of mud they can think of against President Bush,
NOW the MSM is concerned about who is funding a 537 group?
If there was any sliver of doubt in anyones mind that the MSM is doing all it can to elect Kerry, that doubt should be erased.
81 posted on
08/20/2004 5:27:08 PM PDT by
PogySailor
(Proud member of the RAM)
To: johnny7
On Brit's panel yesterday, Birnbaum (from Wash Post) said he and Kondrake had investigated and they could not find any link between the Bush campaign and the SwiftVets.
I would trust what these guys say long before I would trust anybody connected with Kerry.
Again .. this is nothing more that the dems and their projection technique .. Blaming Bush for doing something illegal when the dems have actually been doing the illegal stuff.
82 posted on
08/20/2004 7:25:17 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: The only way to Peace is through Victory!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson