Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatoRenasci

I don't think Hillary would touch 2004 with a ten-foot pole. She knows it's a losing proposition. She's interested in 2008, when the Republicans don't have an incumbent advantage. Why spend a lot of political capital on an election fight against a strong opponent that isn't likely to be won anyway?

She'll be their nominee in 08. Not this time. Kerry is the sacrificial lamb in 04. They had to run *somebody*. He ain't going to win- Hillary will make certain of that. If he gets some sweet consolation prize after losing the election, like a choice committee appointment, then he was in on it. If he doesn't, then he was exploited by the 'rats because he's an egotist. If Kerry did win in 04, she'd have to wait until 2012. She ain't going to do that.

I'm looking for a rat full-court press in '08, with Hillary leading the charge.


117 posted on 08/20/2004 7:11:59 AM PDT by Riley (Need an experienced computer tech in the DC Metro area? I'm looking. Freepmail for details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Riley
He ain't going to win- Hillary will make certain of that. If he gets some sweet consolation prize after losing the election, like a choice committee appointment, then he was in on it.

Oh please!

239 posted on 08/20/2004 7:50:30 AM PDT by ItIsATigerIMarried
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson