Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Woodstock Myth
Front Page Magazine ^ | August 156, 2004 | Michael P. Tremoglie

Posted on 08/16/2004 1:17:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Who could forget the sitar-like harmonies of Crosby, Stills and Nash? The " better living through chemistry " pulsations of Sly and the Family Stone, the chanting of Country Joe and the Fish, and the wonderfully wacky Wavy Gravy? Woodstock - a place where people ("half a million people strong") gathered for peace, love, and music. An event that represented a generation of youth.

Well, not quite.

Contrary to the prevailing myths about Woodstock, it was not an altruistic event.

Woodstock was all about money.

John Roberts, the Ivy League heir to the Polident fortune, financed it. He and his partners were in it for profit. They never stated otherwise. Max Yasgur, whose farm was the site of the event and whose name was immortalized in song, was anything but a simple dairy farmer. He was an NYU graduate and one of the wealthiest farmers in the area. He also walked away with $75,000 or about $300,000 in current dollars – not bad for the three-day rental of six hundred idle acres.

The Who was paid the then-unheard-of sum of $12,000 for their participation. Three groups refused to go on until they received cash in advance. The promoters had to get an advance from a local banker on a Saturday night in order to prevent a riot.

A ticket was approximately eighteen dollars. In an era when the minimum wage was $1.60/hour, a ticket was two days' pay. That does not count lost wages for taking off from work, travel expenses, and of course, the drugs – closer to a week's pay. The boys and girls (not ladies and gentlemen) of Woodstock were not all that inclusive. Woodstock was not for the poor.

If there is any significance to Woodstock (and the point is debatable), it is the symbolic irony of it. The Woodstock audience was composed of enlightened and compassionate liberals – at least that is what they thought of themselves. These were people who wanted to fed the poor and help the helpless. Yet promoters spent more than $2 million dollars staging Woodstock ($10 million in current dollars.) Ten million dollars, let alone the ticket receipts of that historic concert, could have bought many a breakfast in Appalachia or in the ghettoes its attendants allegedly cared so much about. These people are now part of the government's social welfare complex and self-indulgent leftist academic "culture," preaching "social justice" to their students.

Things quickly went haywire within the concert. "I remember building a fire one morning for breakfast. All we had was hot dogs and spaghetti," a Woodstock alumnus waxed nostalgically in a magazine article. Ironically, when Woodstock's well-to-do audience could not feed themselves (let alone the downtrodden), the hippies called on the very people they spurned to feed them: the National Guard. The Left needed those warmongering, baby killing, murdering monsters of the military establishment to drop food from helicopters to save them. The liberal Democrats, Naderites, and far-Leftists who planned this fiasco were dependent on the generosity of the "Military-Industrial Establishment." This is also the same National Guard that is now derided by liberal Democrats as "Chickenhawks." How ironic that the people who criticize President George W. Bush’s National Guard service were probably saved from starvation by his brethren.

The very same people who want to plan every aspect of the economy and society could not even plan a rock concert.

Another myth is that Woodstock, though intended to be a moneymaking venture, became a free concert through the benevolence of the concert's producers. Although it was good PR, this was not true. The promoters had to make it a free concert. The Woodstock generation wants what they want - and they want it free. They wanted to go to the concert so they crashed the gate.

It was the promoter’s fault. In order to get local approval the promoters purposely furnished low attendance figures. However, they did not realize how effective their marketing would be. Twice as many people came as they expected - ten times the amount they had told the locals.

Good intentions did not make Woodstock a free concert; poor business planning did.

Woodstock exposed the hypocrisy of the Left. A half a million people either spent money that could have been donated to charity and depended on the military to serve them food. The performers also earned substantial sums for their appearances. The only money donated was to Abbie Hoffman's fanatics, and that only because he extorted it by stating he would disrupt the concert.

They did all of this while inveighing against the capitalist system.

Country Joe's lyrical lamentation asked why we were in Vietnam. His answer was found during the Seventies - in the re-education programs of communist Vietnam, in the boat people who fled Vietnam on anything that could float, and in the killing fields of Cambodia.

The "Boys in the Wood" later proclaimed themselves "veterans." In their characteristic hubris, they want to erect a "monument" to Woodstock. What is there to venerate? Woodstock was nothing more than pampered kids acting irresponsibly. These Woodstock veterans are now advocating the election of one of their fellow antiwar activists, John Kerry.

In Washington, D.C., the genuine monument to real veterans of that era bears some 50,000 names on it. The Vietnam Memorial lists the names of real veterans, kids who did their duty. They were the real altruists. Their concerts were in places like Bien Hoa and Ia Drang. They are the finest men their time had to offer and the ones who should define their generation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antiwar; johnkerry; liberals; vietnam; woodstock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2004 1:17:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

How did Woodstock help to feed a hungry child?


2 posted on 08/16/2004 1:19:17 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

John Kerry was at Woodstock over Christmas 1968.


3 posted on 08/16/2004 1:23:31 AM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang

John Kerry was there when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.


4 posted on 08/16/2004 1:24:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang

Ping from one of the 500,000 . More later ...


5 posted on 08/16/2004 1:25:46 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Cincinatus' Wife

bump for later


7 posted on 08/16/2004 1:34:14 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The hallmark of the sixties was not Woodstock, but two later concert/debacles, Altamont and the Isle of Wight festival. Just watch "Gimme Shelter" to see it all unfold (at Altamont, that is). The peace loving hippies were giving the bands crap for charging money while the Hell's Angels beat the holy sh*t out of everyone. Things were so bad that the Grateful Dead refused to go on (there's some footage of hippies giving Jerry Garcia an earful for charging money to play). The Isle of Wight was ugly too, really gnarly hippies kicking down the fence erected around the festival grounds and threatening the promoters. Scary stuff.


8 posted on 08/16/2004 3:05:09 AM PDT by drew (fear of a liberal planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drew

9 posted on 08/16/2004 3:09:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://pro.lookingat.us/KerryVVAW.jpg&imgrefurl=http://00access.tripod.com/Kerry-11.html&h=570&w=484&sz=68&tbnid=b6YfhTDIc9sJ:&tbnh=130&tbnw=111&start=14&prev=/images%3Fq%3Danti-war,%2Bjohn%2Bkerry%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG
10 posted on 08/16/2004 3:13:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Oh my God! Mom and Dad! ;-)


11 posted on 08/16/2004 3:14:06 AM PDT by drew (fear of a liberal planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

And how many port-a-potties were there?


12 posted on 08/16/2004 3:16:26 AM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Kerry brought his Swift Boat up the Hudson River, beached it and walked to get to Woodstock.


13 posted on 08/16/2004 3:37:59 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drew
The hallmark of the sixties was not Woodstock, but two later concert/debacles, Altamont and the Isle of Wight festival. Just watch "Gimme Shelter" to see it all unfold (at Altamont, that is). The peace loving hippies were giving the bands crap for charging money while the Hell's Angels beat the holy sh*t out of everyone. Things were so bad that the Grateful Dead refused to go on (there's some footage of hippies giving Jerry Garcia an earful for charging money to play). The Isle of Wight was ugly too, really gnarly hippies kicking down the fence erected around the festival grounds and threatening the promoters. Scary stuff.

Yep. At Woodstock, the only violence was Pete Townshend decking Abbie Hoffman (hooray!) At Altamont, you had the Hell's Angels stabbing a fan to death, as well as beating up Jefferson Airplane's Marty Balin. And who could forget Joni Mitchell, the woman who wrote the "Woodstock" song, pleading with the crowd to behave at the Isle of Wight show?

14 posted on 08/16/2004 3:41:16 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

"Sitar-like harmonies"?

Smooth, complex -- maybe. Sitar-like?

Sheesh. Must be some good dope this author's smokin'...


15 posted on 08/16/2004 3:42:08 AM PDT by DJ Frisat (Kerry makes Mexican Jumping Beans appear lethargic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
Smooth, complex -- maybe. Sitar-like?

Made no sense to me either. Droning?

16 posted on 08/16/2004 4:11:37 AM PDT by Huck (I love the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

We just suffered thru the last concert by the band Phish in our area this past weekend. They set up a similar venue. Seems to me, no one knows anything about their music, so my conclusion is that the attraction has to be the drugs.


17 posted on 08/16/2004 5:07:09 AM PDT by aardvark1 (I am doing this because I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1

Phish is not about the drugs. They are little known outside their large and very enthusiastic fan base. They are actually a talented "jam" band with a large amount of original material, but which is also given to imaginative covers of other bands' material (e.g., in November of 1999, they covered the entire album Dark Side of the Moon in one concert).


18 posted on 08/16/2004 5:43:09 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

about four weeks after woodstock I heard Crosby Stills et al in Calif. they are not as good live as in studio. On top of that they complained that the audinence was not paying attention- they (the audience were having fun)- and CSNY could not get their message out. The paying customers said the same thing then "shut up and sing."


19 posted on 08/16/2004 5:44:06 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Nothing will benefit America better than these fvcking losers dying and getting planted in the ground. They've stood for nothing and fallen for everything and the only effect they have is to put the rest of us at peril. On some days, I think about the two hippies I beat the crap out of in Bezerkley. Ahhh, the GOOD ol days!


20 posted on 08/16/2004 5:47:55 AM PDT by gunnygail (John F Kerry sure can "parlez vous a HUMMA HUMMA!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson