Former Colorado Legislator Now In Porn Business With Daughter: "I Feel No Shame"

Rocky Mountain News ^ | 8/7/04 | John aguilar

[Protagoras]

You deserve far better.

We agree on that, so it's not a total loss.

[beezdotcom]

You deserve far better.
We agree on that, so it's not a total loss.

Great!

Now, it's obvious that you've enjoyed far better conversations on FR than ours (or why keep coming back, right?). Perhaps you could link me to some of your more satisfying exchanges on the forum, so I could school myself on a better approach to discourse...thanks!

[Protagoras]

Now, it's obvious that you've enjoyed far better conversations on FR than ours

Once again, we agree. See? There is room for agreement!

[SeeRushToldU_So]

[beezdotcom]

Interesting stuff to be found here...even found the Schwarz article.

[cyborg]

what a waste

[cyborg]

very interesting website thanks! I'll have to bookmark it.

[Repairman Jack]

She was hot when she first got started, but now she's gotten kinda chunky.

[Leatherneck_MT]

A woman, who had been caught in the act of adultery was brought to Jesus Christ by the scribes and Pharisees as a test to see if the Messiah was a liberal in matters of the Law of God. In response to their deceitful query, He didn't condemn the woman, not because He was a liberal, not because He condoned her sin, but because the men who brought the woman to Him were Hypocrites. He was the only person there that day who was free of sin, the only one who had the right to "cast the first stone." He didn't stone her (or her accusers), but instead forgave her and told her to "sin no more." Otherwise, the day is coming when she, if she didn't thereafter repent, won't be stoned, but will be burned - along with the hypocrites who brought her to Him that day, if they didn't thereafter repent of their sin: