Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Colorado Legislator Now In Porn Business With Daughter: "I Feel No Shame"
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 8/7/04 | John aguilar

Posted on 08/10/2004 8:19:17 AM PDT by dukeman

A former Colorado lawmaker and parole board chairman now works in the family business - but it's no dry cleaner or mom-and-pop restaurant.

These days, Larry Schwarz can be found at Platinum X Pictures, a hard-core adult-film company in California's San Fernando Valley.

Debbie, his wife of 24 years, is director of sales. Their 28-year-old daughter, Stephany, is co-owner and star of the company, where she goes by the stage name Jewel DeNyle.

"I feel no shame, as I have learned that what we do in our office is no different than any other business," Larry Schwarz says. "It is the adult-entertainment industry, and it's not violent like what you see in real-life daily news or in mainstream movies."

Schwarz says he works on the decidedly unsexy side of the porn business - managing the warehouse in Canoga Park, marketing tapes and DVDs, and overseeing payroll and collections - and spends no time on the production side, where the movies are shot and edited.

"It is not a porn shop, it is a warehouse distribution center, like any other, shipping VHS and DVD products - period," he says.

"It looks very much like a truck terminal without a dock. I'm still the same person as before, working with a different product and trying to do the best possible job and create profits. It's only different in the minds of those who wish to make it so."

People who knew Schwarz as a Republican legislator twice elected to represent a conservative House district in southern Colorado say they can't fathom his being part of the $6 billion porn industry.

"I could put my finger in an electrical socket and I wouldn't get this kind of a shock," says Ken Chlouber, the Republican president pro tem of the Colorado Senate, who worked with Schwarz on several bills and once wintered his burros on Schwarz's ranch in Wetmore. "If you knew Larry, none of this fits."

A former trucking company executive, Schwarz was tapped in 1997 by then-Gov. Roy Romer for a seat on the state's Parole Board. He was reappointed by Gov. Bill Owens three years later.

Then everything unraveled.

Authorities raided Schwarz's Wetmore home on Dec. 4, 2001, looking for child pornography.

According to court records, police removed cartoon books depicting children having sex and other items, including tapes of DeNyle from Schwarz's home.

Police also investigated claims that Schwarz had sexually molested family members years earlier.

No charges were filed, but Owens fired him from the Parole Board.

Schwarz says that after 15 months of unsuccessful job hunting, the position at his daughter's film company was the "only one available" to him.

Schwarz and his wife moved to Los Angeles in March 2003 to help Stephany, who was already an industry star, get her own adult-movie company off the ground.

Stephany, who refused to be interviewed for this story, spent nine years in the tiny town of Wetmore, 20 miles south of Cañon City. She is the biological daughter of Debbie Schwarz and was adopted by Larry while still a child. [Oh, tell me this guy hasn't been watching porno flicks of his adopted daughter. Ugh!]

People in Wetmore remember Stephany as a rowdy high school student, but Schwarz says he never detected signs that she was heading toward life as a porn star.

"I would much rather she were on the silver screen with Mel Gibson, but life happens not always as we wish," Schwarz says. "We both decided early on that it was better to be there for our daughter and help her avoid other situations which may have been even more devastating.

"When (Stephany) first told us what she was doing for a living, she stressed that she is who she is at home, and Jewel only while at work. She has done an outstanding job at maintaining that distinction throughout her career. We are proud of her."

Schwarz's willingness to further the adult-film career of his adopted daughter by marketing and distributing her films is baffling to some.

"When you have children, why in the world would you promote them doing pornography?" asks Norma Anderson, a Republican state senator and co-majority leader at the time Schwarz was in the House.

Schwarz says he played no role in Stephany's choice to enter the adult-film industry, noting that she decided to do so long before he ever joined her in California. And, he said, she recently decided to retire from performing.

Schwarz also said he isn't in the adult-film business for the money. While he wouldn't disclose his salary at Platinum X, Schwarz says it is substantially less than the $77,928 a year he earned on the Colorado Parole Board.

At work, Schwarz says he takes extra precautions with his daughter's image and "specifically avoids seeing her in anything she performs."

When it's time to choose explicit photographs of DeNyle for use in promotional materials, Schwarz says he refuses to take part.

"I think it's great that Jewel's parents have an open mind about their daughter being in the adult industry," says Michael Stefano, a co-owner of Platinum X and a performer in the industry. "Jewel is very close with both of her parents and would do anything for them."

It's possible that Schwarz, who calls his Platinum X family a "team of mother, father, daughter and associates," is breaking new ground in an industry that thrives on expanding the concept of what's acceptable.

To date, the phenomenon of parents working directly for, or with, their porn-star offspring is still fairly unusual, says Mark Kernes, a senior editor with Adult Video News, an industry trade magazine.

Schwarz's former neighbors in Wetmore aren't turning their back on him.

"I don't think there is anyone you can talk to up here that would bad-mouth him," says Cecilia Sanders.

A group of longtime residents that gathers regularly for conversation and coffee at the Wetmore Community Center recalls Schwarz as "nice" and "personable" and as a legislator who effectively looked out for the interests of Custer, Fremont, Teller and Pueblo counties.

However people categorize his involvement in the adult industry, Schwarz says he will never abandon his Republican ideals of self-reliance, lower taxes and individual freedom.

As for those who question his commitment to family values, Schwarz says the term has many definitions.

Schwarz plans to spend the rest of his working days with his family at Platinum X.

But he still manages to keep the state he called home close at hand, with pictures of cowboys, horses and cattle on his office walls and mountain scenes glowing on his computer screen.

And Schwarz vows to one day return to the state he loves.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: cyborg
Marriage shouldn't confer citizenship. The State's interest in the matter should be only so far as contract law is concerned. The State does not issue licenses before one can enter into other types of contracts nor should it. Marriage is an exception merely because we've allowed a religious matter to become a matter of law.
141 posted on 08/10/2004 1:01:55 PM PDT by Redcloak (Kids, drugs are bad. Mmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

In thinking about it, I agree. It's pretty outdated, and now there's too much abuse of it.


142 posted on 08/10/2004 1:03:16 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I can't believe that no one's said "I see that your Schwarz is bigger than mine."


143 posted on 08/10/2004 1:06:00 PM PDT by Redcloak (Kids, drugs are bad. Mmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
You haven't the capacity to trick me into anything.

You're probably right.

Nor do I fear you do.

No, you probably don't. But your tone indicates you fear I'm trying to do something untowards, I just can't quite tell what.

Nor am I interested in political parties to which I do not belong.

For not being interested in political parties, you spent an awful lot of time in this thread pointing out to everyone that the Republicans can't disavow Schwarz. Repeatedly. As well as insisting that they not lump him in with any other parties. I wish my bank paid interest as handsomely as your non-interest.

I'm happily unable to continue this inane conversation as I must go now. I hope you have fun chasing your tail. Goodbye

How nice for you. If it was inane, why did you bother to participate at all? It speaks poorly of me, but not so well of you, either.

Protagoras was known as the "father of debate" because he taught that there are two sides to every issue.

Guess my side is just inane, and doesn't count...oh well...
144 posted on 08/10/2004 1:07:29 PM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: cyborg; Redcloak
Marriage shouldn't confer citizenship.

In thinking about it, I agree. It's pretty outdated, and now there's too much abuse of it.

But then the writers of, um, every sitcom would have to think of an original idea. :-)

SD

145 posted on 08/10/2004 1:16:47 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

LOL!!!!! Does my post read that marriage is outdated and too much abuse of it?? hehehehe ooops


146 posted on 08/10/2004 1:18:13 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
Of course, I don't want to live under Sharia law, either. But I don't quite agree with your wording. I think a Christian is specifically under an obligation to at least respect the Christian sense of morality in writing laws. In some cases, that may indeed translate to taking an amoral approach to the law, because it best allows the Christian to practice his morality. However, amorality is a slippery slope, too.

No, I wouldn't expect a legislator of any religion to write a law that specifically contradicts his moral views. I wouldn't expect a Vegan to write a law making the eating of meat mandatory or a Muslim to try to outlaw head coverings for women. However, if one is going to participate in the business of governing, there are rules to follow. In the US, that means not writing one's religious views into the law. If I were allowed to insert my Christian beliefs into law then there would be nothing to stop a Muslim from inserting Sharia law into our legal codes. Since I do not want the latter, I cannot insist upon the former.

147 posted on 08/10/2004 1:20:50 PM PDT by Redcloak (Kids, drugs are bad. Mmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
If I were allowed to insert my Christian beliefs into law then there would be nothing to stop a Muslim from inserting Sharia law into our legal codes.

That's not entirely true...unless Muslims comprised a majority of the voting bloc, or unless there was an activist court with a Muslim bias, it would be difficult to do.

By the way, what rule is there about writing one's religious views into the law? With few exceptions, you can't get a law to stay on the books (well, indefinitely, anyway) unless supported by a majority of people. If it's supported by a majority of the people, is it still a religious view, or a societal one? If a court decides it, then the interpretation is subject to their own biases.

I guess I'm just a bit of a cynic, and I ALWAYS assume there's going to be bias in law and interpretations - in which case, I'd rather it be a bias I agree with.
148 posted on 08/10/2004 1:37:08 PM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Does my post read that marriage is outdated and too much abuse of it??

No, I mean every sitcom in history (well, nearly) has done an episode where someone gets married just so a foreigner can stay in the country. And then they always have to "fool" some INS inspector who quizzes the couple, seperately.

That 70s Show was the latest to do so, just last season.

SD

149 posted on 08/10/2004 1:40:18 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Hehehe well actually you're right about that... I don't wath 70s Show that much. There's something really annoying about it that I can't quite put my finger on.


150 posted on 08/10/2004 1:41:27 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
However, if one is going to participate in the business of governing, there are rules to follow. In the US, that means not writing one's religious views into the law.

It is not a mere "Christian belief" that killing the unborn is murder. There are even athiests who can recognize murder when they see it.

This isn't outlawing meat on Friday, this is a fundamental question of life. If gov't is not to be bothered with protecting life, what use is it?

SD

151 posted on 08/10/2004 1:43:23 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Why? Are there strict entry requirements for being a Republican?


152 posted on 08/10/2004 1:47:13 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Amen.


153 posted on 08/10/2004 1:48:04 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

The fluffer.


154 posted on 08/10/2004 1:51:36 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Junior

No but the republican party platform and ideals do not mesh with the skin trade that is pornography. The libertarian party platform is pro-abortion and pro-porngraphy. The republican party is platform is pro-life and anti-pornography. Which party would welcome him more?


155 posted on 08/10/2004 1:55:11 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2

LOL!

I was "Little Red Chief"


156 posted on 08/10/2004 8:45:11 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Thank you for that. I think I'm gonna be sick.


157 posted on 08/10/2004 8:52:53 PM PDT by Havoc (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

My pleasure, and here's a breakfast bump for the quesy!


158 posted on 08/11/2004 5:15:58 AM PDT by dukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
For not being interested in political parties, you spent an awful lot of time in this thread pointing out to everyone that the Republicans can't disavow Schwarz.

Not entirely correct. I point out that no political party can dump their miscreants on a different party without being called on it. This guy is not and never has been a Libertarian, much less a libertarian. The other poster just wanted to smear a party and philosophy with which he/she disagrees.

I really don't care about either of these parties, I'm interested in urging people to debate ideas, not childishly try to stain one group with a person. I'm sorry you don't understand the concepts.

How nice for you. If it was inane, why did you bother to participate at all?

It took a few posts to identify for sure that it was going no where. I was hoping for something better, it didn't work out that way.

Guess my side is just inane, and doesn't count...oh well...

Difficult to figure out what your side is. I'll count it if it ever becomes apparent.

The offer to discuss ideas still stands. The nonsense about who belongs to what party is a non starter with me. I have already pointed out how imbecilic that is and nother further need be said on the topic. (Until the next goof comes along and needs to be rebuked)

159 posted on 08/11/2004 6:54:08 AM PDT by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
I'm interested in urging people to debate ideas, not childishly try to stain one group with a person. I'm sorry you don't understand the concepts.

I'm sorry, too. I wish you luck in discerning more quickly in the future when the other poster is a person like me, and thus a complete waste of your time. You seem sincerely frustrated that I wasn't more attuned to your intentions, and I apologize for that. You deserve far better.
160 posted on 08/11/2004 7:56:52 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson