[Perlstein]

"Say, when you ask whether a nice guy would invade a country at the cost of untold innocent lives on the shakiest of pretenses?"

Supported by John Kerry, John Edwards, most of the Senate, and the intelligences estimates of which were agreed by every country on record.
----
I disagreed with them, too. Why do you people behave as if all liberals read from some sheet of talking points?

Here's my savaging of the Democrats who were taken in on the Iraq vote:

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2002/11/we_192_01.html

[gopwinsin04]

Any comments on Kerry's conflicting testimony in the NY Sun about the Winter Soldier meetings in Kansas City where the assassinations of senators were actively discussed with him present? (and why the media was so hesitant to delve into the issue)

[Phantom Lord]

Was the US Congress and President Clinton wrong in 1998 to make removal of Saddam from power the offical policy of the United States?

Also, liberals all over America clamor for UN support and mostly the support of France before convening military action. Yet I don't hear liberals condeming France for military action in The Ivory Coast without UN support. Why is that? And why can France condemn us for taking military action without their support or the support of the UN, but it is AOK for them to engage in military actions without the support of the UN?

[cyncooper]

Why do you people behave as if all liberals read from some sheet of talking points?

It is reasonable to assume that a liberal supports John Kerry over George Bush. If you don't, calmly explaining where and why you disagree with Kerry will do the trick here on FR.

I'm afraid you are the guilty party in this phenomenon you complain about. You are the one who composes not only replies on a forum, but whole articles, claiming that the musings of a few obscure individuals represent "conservatives" and/or Bush supporters' positions and thinking.

[Phantom Lord]

Still waiting for you to list Kerry's legislative accomplishments from his 20 years in the Senate.

[alisasny]

A SAVAGING? THAT IS PRETTY FUNNY.... You are going to vote for Kerry and Edwards...right....you bash Edwards in total in your article but you dont even bat an eye when your vote comes up in NOV.

I cant call that a savaging article.

[F.J. Mitchell]

"Why do you people behave as if all liberals read from some sheet of talking points."

LOL! It couldn't be because the only other rational assumption would be that the DNC has planted a reciever into every liberal's ear, would it?

Can you deny that all liberal spokesmen and women, sound like alpinesque echos of every other liberal?

[Uncle Miltie]

"Supported by John Kerry, John Edwards, most of the Senate, and the intelligences estimates of which were agreed by every country on record." ----

I disagreed with them, too. Why do you people behave as if all liberals read from some sheet of talking points?

Here's my savaging of the Democrats who were taken in on the Iraq vote...

So your record reflects that John Kerry, John Edwards et al (GWB) are not "nice guy(s)" due to their votes in favor of the Iraq war.

Glad we cleared that up. Anyone who supported the Iraq War is not "a nice guy." So long as you savage Kerry next time you meet him...