Well as long as we're tin-foiling...
It's also possible that the "only one species" angle was spin, so people would say exactly what has been said, that it couldn't have been a nuke or it would have killed more than one species. How many reporters would know the difference if they were told by some "official" that "there's no story here, only one species, probably upwelling, move along now" ??
Remember the story about the parachutists at the DNC? I told my sister about it while it was happening. Next morning, she checked the updated news articles/reports on FR, which were the official story that "they were mistaken" - and my sister said "looks like it turned out to be nothing."
The point is, people believe anything if it's in print. If it was printed that it was only one species of fish that died, does that make it true? How would we ever know?
< /tinfoil>
(But I can't seem to "spin" the oceanic currents backwards no matter how hard I try.)
Did anyone see the short segment on Fox a little while ago, about the killer whales in the Gulf?
They're not supposed to be down by Corpus Christi, in warm waters, but should be in cooler waters, like the Pacific NW.
Maybe someone has posted it already, but why are they so far off course. It's apparently very unusual.