Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Godzilla; HipShot; judicial meanz; Honestly; Domestic Church; JustPiper; All
"Author of the article makes some good observations. Go with last plan or assimilate until secure comms can be re-established."

I agree. Have to think about the psychological makeup and training of the "trigger pullers" in such a case. If they're pros with a high amount of training, will they think independently and out of the box? Will they assess the risk factor and have enough intuition to proceed to another target or stand down to insure success another day? Folks with training in infiltration can recede into the background, fade away and strike at another target, later.

Fanatics don't need a lot of wasted training in "trade craft." They can be trusted to execute a suicide operation on time and within the parameters rehearsed in the plan. But they won't be able to function for long periods of time in an American cultural landscape, which they both hate and fear for the freedoms it gives to women. They'll know this and be more likely to just go ahead and pull the trigger anyway on the last named and planned target. There is a distinct danger to us in this mindset. If we fail to think like the fanatic, we may assume there is too much risk to the terrorists and subconsciously drop our guard, just enough for a suicide operation to succeed.

It's not enough to catch them in the act, because even putting a bullet into the forehead of somebody whose thumb is on the trigger of a nuclear or ANFO device equipped with a "dead man switch" won't stop them because the event still occurs. Was that too convoluted a sentence? Do you see what I'm getting at, here?

1,110 posted on 08/04/2004 2:39:32 PM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier

Easily understood. I don't agree with the premise of the article.

It assumes that the head is cut off, and I'm not convinced of that.

It also assumes that these guys are drones, but I'm more inclined to think they've got standing orders to be self reliant WRT targets.


1,113 posted on 08/04/2004 2:43:36 PM PDT by HipShot (EOM couldn't cut the head off a beer with a chainsaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: ExSoldier; All

War Gaming Terrorism

This is the first part of a series of analyses that seeks to game out potential terrorist attacks from the terrorist point of view, using something other than the farcical paradigms used by software engineers.  It relies instead on the real world where unknowns and variables abound, where cultural blindness and differences impact greatly and human frailty is a constant.  Where limited resources, betrayals and impersonations are a part of the environment… an unclean world fraught with uncertainty and risk.

< snip >

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/marzullo/2004/marzullo080104.htm

War Gaming Terrorism, Part 1

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/marzullo/2004/marzullo080204.htm

War Gaming Terrorism, Part 2

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/marzullo/2004/marzullo080304.htm

War Gaming Terrorism, Part 3

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/marzullo/2004/marzullo080404.htm

War Gaming Terrorism, Part 4


1,128 posted on 08/04/2004 3:00:27 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson