[robertpaulsen]

"to correct errors which both of us admit"

Whoa! I didn't say "errors". Don't put words into my mouth.

I said it was inconsistent with other cases, and "for some reason" they ruled differently. I don't know the reason. You don't know the reason. AFAIK, it could be a valid reason.

"Such is the expected consequence of unConstitutional decisions."

Now see? You state this as though it were a fact. It's not. It's your opinion. Looks like fact though, doesn't it?

[William Tell]

robertpaulsen said: "I said it was inconsistent with other cases, and "for some reason" they ruled differently. I don't know the reason. You don't know the reason. AFAIK, it could be a valid reason."

Post 462 by robertpaulsen: "You are correct, it shouldn't."

[inquest]

I said it was inconsistent with other cases, and "for some reason" they ruled differently. I don't know the reason. You don't know the reason. AFAIK, it could be a valid reason.

If it was a valid reason, then they would have stated the reason, don't you think?