Miller gave us nothing. There was no ruling. The defense never showed. The case was remanded.
robertpaulsen wrote:
I'm done explaining things to you.
_____________________________________
Paulsen you've never even got ~close~ to explaining anything to anybody here.
Yet here you are, still playing your silly game.
I truly believe you really cannot understand our constitutional principles of liberty & freedom, those you claim to support.
No ruling? Lower courts have certainly cited it incorrectly but not because there was no ruling. WE know that there was no defense, but the lower courts have never acknowledge that weakness of Miller that I am aware of.