1 posted on
07/27/2004 9:46:22 AM PDT by
JOAT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: JOAT
OSHKOSH................
MYGOSH
42 posted on
07/27/2004 10:19:14 AM PDT by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: JOAT
I shoot home intruders on sight. Lucky for them I don't live there.
To: JOAT
I have updated my FMCDH sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the communist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, and the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government. FMCDH(BITS)
49 posted on
07/27/2004 10:25:23 AM PDT by
nothingnew
(KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
To: JOAT; All
This is a valid case for the ACLU, however, I doubt very much they will be fighting this case.
50 posted on
07/27/2004 10:25:46 AM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: JOAT
51 posted on
07/27/2004 10:27:56 AM PDT by
two23
To: JOAT
You need to use "banglist" as a keyword above, to link to the old "*bang_list" bookmarks most folks still use. Just say NO to tyranny!
Molon Labe!
52 posted on
07/27/2004 10:28:00 AM PDT by
TERMINATTOR
(Don't blame me - I voted for McClintock!)
To: JOAT
Look, even if this article is 100% factual from beginning to end, don't sweat it. The ACLU will come in and sort this all out. It's their job. [/snot]
53 posted on
07/27/2004 10:29:20 AM PDT by
Gefreiter
("Ignorance is king. Many would not prosper by its abdication.")
To: JOAT
I thought this was Massachusetts until I read further...
To: JOAT
WTF?
Has anyone verified this story in one of the local papers? This doesn't pass the smell test. It would have made national headlines for the scope of Constitutional abuses.
56 posted on
07/27/2004 10:34:47 AM PDT by
7.62 x 51mm
(• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
To: Eaker
Outrage ping.
Buy
Lots
Of
Ammo
Today
To: JOAT
70 posted on
07/27/2004 10:56:12 AM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: JOAT
man of interest and his wifeOutside of all the illegal activity by the police in this story, I'm sick of these stupid politically correct euphemisms. What ever happened to "suspect"?
80 posted on
07/27/2004 11:07:27 AM PDT by
badbass
To: JOAT
Most current published data on Violent Crime from the Bureau of Justice Statistics:
Not sure if a weapon used = 6%
Total Non-firearm = 17% (knife, bottle, 2x4, etc)
TOTAL FIREARM = 9% (from Saturday Night Special to Atomic Cannon)
No weapon used = 68%
How are the Oshgosh B'gosh police doing with the 68%?
To: JOAT
Citizens' guns were seized through searches of area homes. The police promised to return the firearms after forensic tests proved they were not involved in the crime. F$%^ THAT ..... there would have been dead cops if they tried that in my neighborhood .....
It would have been WAY past time here.
88 posted on
07/27/2004 11:14:53 AM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Many a law, many a commandment have I broken, but my word never.)
To: JOAT
This incident has made it around to several other websites as well. As here, most seem to focus on the constitutionality (or lack of same) of the police actions. A few have noticed another thing though.
Does anybody remember the California Highway Patrolman who was shot down as he exited a courthouse a couple of months ago? Like here, in that case every available police officer hit the streets, kicking bushes and shaking trees, looking for the shooter. Why dont those same police forces use similar tactics when an ordinary citizen is shot? Are we to believe that the lives and well-being of police officers is more important than that of the peons? If that is true, then we have devolved from a constitutional republic to something more akin to Japanese feudalism, complete with a Samurai class which holds our lives and property in its hands.
Someday, somewhere, someone will shoot a police officer and as a defense he will claim that he thought the officer was drawing a gun and shot in self-defense. If that defense holds up in court I will then begin to believe that we citizens are truly equal to police officers in the eyes of the law.
I dont think Ill hold my breath
.
94 posted on
07/27/2004 11:24:40 AM PDT by
oldfart
("All governments and all civilizations fall... eventually. Our government is not immune.)
To: JOAT
To: JOAT
104 posted on
07/27/2004 11:49:27 AM PDT by
take
To: JOAT
what they see as theft of their property "What they see"? -- Someone at that paper has a mental breakdown.
It was theft.
111 posted on
07/27/2004 12:15:31 PM PDT by
bvw
To: JOAT
Hey everybody! I've got a real nice bridge for sale, but you better hurry, alot of people are interested in it and it's gonna sell quick!
Step right up, hurry, hurry, did I tell you it's on the National Historic Register? Made of solid gold! Precious gems throughout.
Be the first one on your block to own your very own solid gold, jewel encrusted bridge!
114 posted on
07/27/2004 12:25:00 PM PDT by
Cap'n Crunch
(Looks like alot of suckers.....er...did I say suckers? I meant TAKERS here.)
To: JOAT; ChefKeith; steveegg
CK 4th Amendment problem at the very least??
Wisconsin ping
116 posted on
07/27/2004 12:26:34 PM PDT by
WestCoastGal
(aka Coco~~~~~~>Freeping & Nascar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How Bad Have You Got It????)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson