Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2004 9:46:22 AM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: JOAT
OSHKOSH................

MYGOSH

42 posted on 07/27/2004 10:19:14 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

I shoot home intruders on sight. Lucky for them I don't live there.


43 posted on 07/27/2004 10:19:53 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
I have updated my FMCDH sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the communist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, and the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government.

FMCDH(BITS)

49 posted on 07/27/2004 10:25:23 AM PDT by nothingnew (KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT; All

This is a valid case for the ACLU, however, I doubt very much they will be fighting this case.


50 posted on 07/27/2004 10:25:46 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

C.D.H. Bump


51 posted on 07/27/2004 10:27:56 AM PDT by two23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
You need to use "banglist" as a keyword above, to link to the old "*bang_list" bookmarks most folks still use. Just say NO to tyranny!

Molon Labe!

52 posted on 07/27/2004 10:28:00 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR (Don't blame me - I voted for McClintock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

Look, even if this article is 100% factual from beginning to end, don't sweat it. The ACLU will come in and sort this all out. It's their job. [/snot]


53 posted on 07/27/2004 10:29:20 AM PDT by Gefreiter ("Ignorance is king. Many would not prosper by its abdication.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

I thought this was Massachusetts until I read further...


54 posted on 07/27/2004 10:32:16 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

WTF?

Has anyone verified this story in one of the local papers? This doesn't pass the smell test. It would have made national headlines for the scope of Constitutional abuses.


56 posted on 07/27/2004 10:34:47 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eaker
Outrage ping.

Buy
Lots
Of
Ammo
Today

61 posted on 07/27/2004 10:38:56 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

BTTT


70 posted on 07/27/2004 10:56:12 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
man of interest and his wife

Outside of all the illegal activity by the police in this story, I'm sick of these stupid politically correct euphemisms. What ever happened to "suspect"?

80 posted on 07/27/2004 11:07:27 AM PDT by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
Most current published data on Violent Crime from the Bureau of Justice Statistics:

Not sure if a weapon used = 6%
Total Non-firearm = 17% (knife, bottle, 2x4, etc)
TOTAL FIREARM = 9% (from Saturday Night Special to Atomic Cannon)
No weapon used = 68%

How are the Oshgosh B'gosh police doing with the 68%?
87 posted on 07/27/2004 11:14:44 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
Citizens' guns were seized through searches of area homes. The police promised to return the firearms after forensic tests proved they were not involved in the crime.

F$%^ THAT ..... there would have been dead cops if they tried that in my neighborhood .....

It would have been WAY past time here.

88 posted on 07/27/2004 11:14:53 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Many a law, many a commandment have I broken, but my word never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

This incident has made it around to several other websites as well. As here, most seem to focus on the constitutionality (or lack of same) of the police actions. A few have noticed another thing though.

Does anybody remember the California Highway Patrolman who was shot down as he exited a courthouse a couple of months ago? Like here, in that case every available police officer hit the streets, kicking bushes and shaking trees, looking for the shooter. Why don’t those same police forces use similar tactics when an ordinary citizen is shot? Are we to believe that the lives and well-being of police officers is more important than that of the peons? If that is true, then we have devolved from a constitutional republic to something more akin to Japanese feudalism, complete with a “Samurai” class which holds our lives and property in its hands.

Someday, somewhere, someone will shoot a police officer and as a defense he will claim that he thought the officer was drawing a gun and shot in self-defense. If that defense holds up in court I will then begin to believe that we citizens are truly equal to police officers in the eyes of the law.

I don’t think I’ll hold my breath….


94 posted on 07/27/2004 11:24:40 AM PDT by oldfart ("All governments and all civilizations fall... eventually. Our government is not immune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
" Police last week seized a number of firearms during consent searches of homes in the area, but need the bullet to match against them. Police also served a search warrant at the property they believe the shot originated from."

The residents gave their consent.

100 posted on 07/27/2004 11:41:15 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT

PoliceState


104 posted on 07/27/2004 11:49:27 AM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
what they see as theft of their property

"What they see"? -- Someone at that paper has a mental breakdown.

It was theft.

111 posted on 07/27/2004 12:15:31 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT
Hey everybody! I've got a real nice bridge for sale, but you better hurry, alot of people are interested in it and it's gonna sell quick!

Step right up, hurry, hurry, did I tell you it's on the National Historic Register? Made of solid gold! Precious gems throughout.

Be the first one on your block to own your very own solid gold, jewel encrusted bridge!

114 posted on 07/27/2004 12:25:00 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch (Looks like alot of suckers.....er...did I say suckers? I meant TAKERS here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JOAT; ChefKeith; steveegg

CK 4th Amendment problem at the very least??

Wisconsin ping


116 posted on 07/27/2004 12:26:34 PM PDT by WestCoastGal (aka Coco~~~~~~>Freeping & Nascar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How Bad Have You Got It????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson