Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plutarch

Irrelevant...you need to read Mr Borchgrave's original article.

http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20040722-051231-9906r.htm


57 posted on 07/24/2004 2:58:38 PM PDT by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Aaron_A

The report also says that "according to a senior tribal leader in Peshawar, bin Laden, who suffers from renal deficiency, has been periodically undergoing dialysis in a Peshawar military hospital with the knowledge and approval of ISI if not of Gen. Pervez Musharraf himself."

The same source, though not in the report, speculated Musharraf may be planning to turn over bin Laden to President Bush in time to clinch his reelection bid in November.

What a bunch of BS. The President of Pakistan would actively hide bin Laden from us, keep him alive, but turn him over before the election to help Bush win.

Anyone else see a logical disconnect from this anonymous Pakistani source?

60 posted on 07/24/2004 3:12:48 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Aaron_A

Bump. Thanks. The original is far more damning than the TOI.

Another home run by Arno.


75 posted on 07/25/2004 2:32:52 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson