Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
Last fall, Berger reviewed thousands of Clinton administration documents at the National Archives that were being sought by the Sept. 11 panel. Two law enforcement sources said archives officials had suspected Berger removed documents during an early visit, and made sure they secretly coded and copied records for the next time he came.

Holy...
3 posted on 07/21/2004 8:47:15 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

If I'm understanding correctly, this means that it may never be completely known what he removed on the first visit(s) before the staff became suspicious. As you say, holy...


4 posted on 07/21/2004 8:51:03 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (The Democratic party has been hijacked by terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
And the dem spokespeople and 9/11 mouthpieces that are saying that Berger "only took copies of original docs, and that all the originals are still in possession of the Archives" are full of sh*t.

It's pretty clear from this story that Berger had his hands on the original versions of various interim drafts of the Clarke memo, and the interim drafts may have contained some damaging points that were 'deleted' from the offical report.

6 posted on 07/21/2004 8:54:03 PM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

This is why the "honest mistake" excuse Berger offered isn't being taken seriously--except by David Gergen.


13 posted on 07/21/2004 8:59:30 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson