Skip to comments.
Frist backs rule change on judges
American Conservative Union (ACU) ^
| 7-21-4
| Alexander Bolton
Posted on 07/21/2004 7:47:32 AM PDT by Redbob
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Possibly of interest to those claiming Frist is like Lott...
This will be enormously important in Bush's second term, when he will likely have the chance to appoint perhaps 3 Supreme Court justices as well as setting the course for the federal judiciary for decades to come.
1
posted on
07/21/2004 7:47:33 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
I'll believe it when I see it. They do a lot of huffing and puffing on this but in the end back down.
2
posted on
07/21/2004 7:50:04 AM PDT
by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: Redbob; OXENinFLA; Howlin
Senate Democratic leadership aides have warned that if Republicans stripped senators of the power to filibuster judges, it would lead to a freeze in bipartisan relations that they compare to a nuclear winter. They say that Democrats would bring the chamber to a standstill in retaliation, but Republican proponents note that Democrats have, for the most part, done so already. Gee .. Nice threat from the Dems
BRING IT ON!!!
3
posted on
07/21/2004 7:50:38 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
To: Redbob
it would lead to a freeze in bipartisan relations that they compare to a nuclear winteri laugh
4
posted on
07/21/2004 7:52:21 AM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: Redbob
Now that it's too late to get more judges through, after three years of getting screwed and doint NOTHING, Frist initiates a rule change in front of the possiblity that Bush will be defeated and Kerry will get his judges through over Republican objections?
Somebody take this moron out and horsewhip some sense into him.
5
posted on
07/21/2004 7:52:24 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
To: Mo1
They say that Democrats would bring the chamber to a standstill in retaliationGood then they can't re-up the AWB!!
6
posted on
07/21/2004 7:53:01 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: Redbob
There are those in the Republican [conference] who would not do that. They think it violates the comity of the Senate, said Richard Lessner, executive director of the American Conservative Union. It seems to me that the RINOs can and will stop any attempt by Frist to change the rules. Unless he has some power over the NE Pubbies I'm afraid this is all for naught.
To: Redbob
The ideal would be to pick up enough seats to overcome the filibuster THEN keep the filibuster rule. It'll take the Dems 100 years before they seat another abortionist.
I think the Dems will eventually change their stance on abortion, period.
8
posted on
07/21/2004 7:54:53 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Mo1
Reminds you of the idiot Dems who left Texas to avoid "do your duty".
9
posted on
07/21/2004 7:56:48 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Sacajaweau
"The ideal would be to pick up enough seats to overcome the filibuster..."Unfortunately, that's not happening anytime soon.
Probably not during Bush's second term.
10
posted on
07/21/2004 7:58:18 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
They need to use the Nuclear option Now! Before the conventions! After the conventions it will be seen as political. Let the fur fly! These politicains need their feet held to the fire.
I know some politicains (RINOs) will jump ship, but the nation needs to see it. The battle lines need to be drawn or we will have another 4 years of Judicial blockage and arrested government.
Leadership needs to be bold or it is not leadership at all. These aren't fillibusters. This is a gentleman's agreement between the parties that has gone awry. Bring back the real fillibusters or our govenment is stymied.
11
posted on
07/21/2004 7:58:34 AM PDT
by
sr4402
To: Redbob
This needs to be a campaign issue
To: VRWC_minion
13
posted on
07/21/2004 8:00:27 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
To: Redbob
They say that Democrats would bring the chamber to a standstill in retaliation, but Republican proponents note that Democrats have, for the most part, done so already. Oh please. If that were the case we wouldn't be seeing massive spending increases.
To: Mo1
Now is the time to use the nuke...
The Dems have already stopped anything of substance... what is there to lose? Nothing as far as I can tell.
16
posted on
07/21/2004 8:05:22 AM PDT
by
hchutch
("Go ahead. Leave early and beat the traffic. The Milwaukee Brewers dare you." - MLB.com 5/11/04)
To: Redbob
They say that Democrats would bring the chamber to a standstill in retaliation...
OH HAPPY DAY!!!
17
posted on
07/21/2004 8:05:59 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: Redbob
To heck with it. Time to bring the VP in, suspend the rules and bring all nominations directly to the floor for an up/down vote.
18
posted on
07/21/2004 8:07:48 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Only the mediocre are always at their best)
To: hchutch
Nothing too lose?
That's never stopped the 'Pubbies before!
It would be interesting to see what we could do with actual leadership in Congress.
I advocate de-electing any GOP candidate who held office under a Dimocratic majority - in Washington or here in Texas.
Anyone accustomed to being in the minority somehow retains that minority-loser mindset.
19
posted on
07/21/2004 8:08:51 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: hchutch
I recall reading that the NE Republican senators would be able to prevent the nuclear option from working.
20
posted on
07/21/2004 8:13:59 AM PDT
by
drc43
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson